Nathaniel Grammel

Brian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma et al.

Matching is one of the most fundamental and broadly applicable problems across many domains. In these diverse real-world applications, there is often a degree of uncertainty in the input which has led to the study of stochastic matching models. Here, each edge in the graph has a known, independent probability of existing derived from some prediction. Algorithms must probe edges to determine existence and match them irrevocably if they exist. Further, each vertex may have a patience constraint denoting how many of its neighboring edges can be probed. We present new ordered contention resolution schemes yielding improved approximation guarantees for some of the foundational problems studied in this area. For stochastic matching with patience constraints in general graphs, we provide a 0.382-approximate algorithm assuming each vertex has patience at least $2$. Under this assumption, we improve upon the previous best 0.31-approximation of Baveja et al. (2018). When the vertices do not have patience constraints, we describe a 0.432-approximate random order probing algorithm with several corollaries such as an improved guarantee for the Prophet Secretary problem under Edge Arrivals. Finally, for the special case of bipartite graphs with unit patience constraints on one of the partitions, we show a 0.632-approximate algorithm that improves on the recent $1/3$-guarantee of Hikima et al. (2021).

J. K. Terry, Benjamin Black, Nathaniel Grammel et al.

This paper introduces the PettingZoo library and the accompanying Agent Environment Cycle ("AEC") games model. PettingZoo is a library of diverse sets of multi-agent environments with a universal, elegant Python API. PettingZoo was developed with the goal of accelerating research in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning ("MARL"), by making work more interchangeable, accessible and reproducible akin to what OpenAI's Gym library did for single-agent reinforcement learning. PettingZoo's API, while inheriting many features of Gym, is unique amongst MARL APIs in that it's based around the novel AEC games model. We argue, in part through case studies on major problems in popular MARL environments, that the popular game models are poor conceptual models of games commonly used in MARL and accordingly can promote confusing bugs that are hard to detect, and that the AEC games model addresses these problems.

J K Terry, Nathaniel Grammel, Benjamin Black et al.

Partially Observable Stochastic Games (POSGs) are the most general and common model of games used in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). We argue that the POSG model is conceptually ill suited to software MARL environments, and offer case studies from the literature where this mismatch has led to severely unexpected behavior. In response to this, we introduce the Agent Environment Cycle Games (AEC Games) model, which is more representative of software implementation. We then prove it's as an equivalent model to POSGs. The AEC games model is also uniquely useful in that it can elegantly represent both all forms of MARL environments, whereas for example POSGs cannot elegantly represent strictly turn based games like chess.

J. K. Terry, Nathaniel Grammel

We introduce a new mathematical model of multi-agent reinforcement learning, the Multi-Agent Informational Learning Processor "MAILP" model. The model is based on the notion that agents have policies for a certain amount of information, models how this information iteratively evolves and propagates through many agents. This model is very general, and the only meaningful assumption made is that learning for individual agents progressively slows over time.

J. K. Terry, Nathaniel Grammel, Sanghyun Son et al.

Parameter sharing, where each agent independently learns a policy with fully shared parameters between all policies, is a popular baseline method for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Unfortunately, since all agents share the same policy network, they cannot learn different policies or tasks. This issue has been circumvented experimentally by adding an agent-specific indicator signal to observations, which we term "agent indication". Agent indication is limited, however, in that without modification it does not allow parameter sharing to be applied to environments where the action spaces and/or observation spaces are heterogeneous. This work formalizes the notion of agent indication and proves that it enables convergence to optimal policies for the first time. Next, we formally introduce methods to extend parameter sharing to learning in heterogeneous observation and action spaces, and prove that these methods allow for convergence to optimal policies. Finally, we experimentally confirm that the methods we introduce function empirically, and conduct a wide array of experiments studying the empirical efficacy of many different agent indication schemes for image based observation spaces.

Nathaniel Grammel, Lisa Hellerstein, Devorah Kletenik et al.

Many problems in Machine Learning can be modeled as submodular optimization problems. Recent work has focused on stochastic or adaptive versions of these problems. We consider the Scenario Submodular Cover problem, which is a counterpart to the Stochastic Submodular Cover problem studied by Golovin and Krause. In Scenario Submodular Cover, the goal is to produce a cover with minimum expected cost, where the expectation is with respect to an empirical joint distribution, given as input by a weighted sample of realizations. In contrast, in Stochastic Submodular Cover, the variables of the input distribution are assumed to be independent, and the distribution of each variable is given as input. Building on algorithms developed by Cicalese et al. and Golovin and Krause for related problems, we give two approximation algorithms for Scenario Submodular Cover over discrete distributions. The first achieves an approximation factor of O(log Qm), where m is the size of the sample and Q is the goal utility. The second, simpler algorithm achieves an approximation bound of O(log QW), where Q is the goal utility and W is the sum of the integer weights. (Both bounds assume an integer-valued utility function.) Our results yield approximation bounds for other problems involving non-independent distributions that are explicitly specified by their support.