Geoffrey Clark

Geoffrey Clark, Joseph Campbell, Heni Ben Amor

We present Model-Predictive Interaction Primitives -- a robot learning framework for assistive motion in human-machine collaboration tasks which explicitly accounts for biomechanical impact on the human musculoskeletal system. First, we extend Interaction Primitives to enable predictive biomechanics: the prediction of future biomechanical states of a human partner conditioned on current observations and intended robot control signals. In turn, we leverage this capability within a model-predictive control strategy to identify the future ergonomic and biomechanical ramifications of potential robot actions. Optimal control trajectories are selected so as to minimize future physical impact on the human musculoskeletal system. We empirically demonstrate that our approach minimizes knee or muscle forces via generated control actions selected according to biomechanical cost functions. Experiments are performed in synthetic and real-world experiments involving powered prosthetic devices.

Geoffrey Clark, Joseph Campbell, Seyed Mostafa Rezayat Sorkhabadi et al.

We propose in this paper Periodic Interaction Primitives - a probabilistic framework that can be used to learn compact models of periodic behavior. Our approach extends existing formulations of Interaction Primitives to periodic movement regimes, i.e., walking. We show that this model is particularly well-suited for learning data-driven, customized models of human walking, which can then be used for generating predictions over future states or for inferring latent, biomechanical variables. We also demonstrate how the same framework can be used to learn controllers for a robotic prosthesis using an imitation learning approach. Results in experiments with human participants indicate that Periodic Interaction Primitives efficiently generate predictions and ankle angle control signals for a robotic prosthetic ankle, with MAE of 2.21 degrees in 0.0008s per inference. Performance degrades gracefully in the presence of noise or sensor fall outs. Compared to alternatives, this algorithm functions 20 times faster and performed 4.5 times more accurately on test subjects.