Casimir J. H. Ludwig

Milton L. Montero, Jeffrey S. Bowers, Rui Ponte Costa et al.

Recent research has shown that generative models with highly disentangled representations fail to generalise to unseen combination of generative factor values. These findings contradict earlier research which showed improved performance in out-of-training distribution settings when compared to entangled representations. Additionally, it is not clear if the reported failures are due to (a) encoders failing to map novel combinations to the proper regions of the latent space or (b) novel combinations being mapped correctly but the decoder/downstream process is unable to render the correct output for the unseen combinations. We investigate these alternatives by testing several models on a range of datasets and training settings. We find that (i) when models fail, their encoders also fail to map unseen combinations to correct regions of the latent space and (ii) when models succeed, it is either because the test conditions do not exclude enough examples, or because excluded generative factors determine independent parts of the output image. Based on these results, we argue that to generalise properly, models not only need to capture factors of variation, but also understand how to invert the generative process that was used to generate the data.

Michele Garibbo, Casimir Ludwig, Nathan Lepora et al.

Machine learning and specifically reinforcement learning (RL) has been extremely successful in helping us to understand neural decision making processes. However, RL's role in understanding other neural processes especially motor learning is much less well explored. To explore this connection, we investigated how recent deep RL methods correspond to the dominant motor learning framework in neuroscience, error-based learning. Error-based learning can be probed using a mirror reversal adaptation paradigm, where it produces distinctive qualitative predictions that are observed in humans. We therefore tested three major families of modern deep RL algorithm on a mirror reversal perturbation. Surprisingly, all of the algorithms failed to mimic human behaviour and indeed displayed qualitatively different behaviour from that predicted by error-based learning. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel deep RL algorithm: model-based deterministic policy gradients (MB-DPG). MB-DPG draws inspiration from error-based learning by explicitly relying on the observed outcome of actions. We show MB-DPG captures (human) error-based learning under mirror-reversal and rotational perturbation. Next, we demonstrate error-based learning in the form of MB-DPG learns faster than canonical model-free algorithms on complex arm-based reaching tasks, while being more robust to (forward) model misspecification than model-based RL. These findings highlight the gap between current deep RL methods and human motor adaptation and offer a route to closing this gap, facilitating future beneficial interaction between between the two fields.

Shijia Feng, Michael Wray, Brian Sullivan et al.

Determining when people are struggling allows for a finer-grained understanding of actions that complements conventional action classification and error detection. Struggle detection, as defined in this paper, is a distinct and important task that can be identified without explicit step or activity knowledge. We introduce the first struggle dataset with three real-world problem-solving activities that are labelled by both expert and crowd-source annotators. Video segments were scored w.r.t. their level of struggle using a forced choice 4-point scale. This dataset contains 5.1 hours of video from 73 participants. We conducted a series of experiments to identify the most suitable modelling approaches for struggle determination. Additionally, we compared various deep learning models, establishing baseline results for struggle classification, struggle regression, and struggle label distribution learning. Our results indicate that struggle detection in video can achieve up to $88.24\%$ accuracy in binary classification, while detecting the level of struggle in a four-way classification setting performs lower, with an overall accuracy of $52.45\%$. Our work is motivated toward a more comprehensive understanding of action in video and potentially the improvement of assistive systems that analyse struggle and can better support users during manual activities.

Cindy Xiong, Cristina R. Ceja, Casimir J. H. Ludwig et al.

In visual depictions of data, position (i.e., the vertical height of a line or a bar) is believed to be the most precise way to encode information compared to other encodings (e.g., hue). Not only are other encodings less precise than position, but they can also be prone to systematic biases (e.g., color category boundaries can distort perceived differences between hues). By comparison, position's high level of precision may seem to protect it from such biases. In contrast, across three empirical studies, we show that while position may be a precise form of data encoding, it can also produce systematic biases in how values are visually encoded, at least for reports of average position across a short delay. In displays with a single line or a single set of bars, reports of average positions were significantly biased, such that line positions were underestimated and bar positions were overestimated. In displays with multiple data series (i.e., multiple lines and/or sets of bars), this systematic bias still persisted. We also observed an effect of "perceptual pull", where the average position estimate for each series was 'pulled' toward the other. These findings suggest that, although position may still be the most precise form of visual data encoding, it can also be systematically biased.