Nadica Miljković

2papers

2 Papers

DLSep 13, 2021Code
Towards FAIR Principles for Open Hardware

Nadica Miljković, Ana Trisovic, Limor Peer

The lack of scientific openness is identified as one of the key challenges of computational reproducibility. In addition to Open Data, Free and Open-source Software (FOSS) and Open Hardware (OH) can address this challenge by introducing open policies, standards, and recommendations. However, while both FOSS and OH are free to use, study, modify, and redistribute, there are significant differences in sharing and reusing these artifacts. FOSS is increasingly supported with software repositories, but support for OH is lacking, potentially due to the complexity of its digital format and licensing. This paper proposes leveraging FAIR principles to make OH findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. We define what FAIR means for OH, how it differs from FOSS, and present examples of unique demands. Also, we evaluate dissemination platforms currently used for OH and provide recommendations.

SPMay 5, 2020
Effect of the sEMG electrode (re)placement and feature set size on the hand movement recognition

Nadica Miljković, Milica S. Isaković

Repositioning of recording electrode array across repeated electromyography measurements may result in a displacement error in hand movement classification systems. In order to examine if the classifier re-training could reach satisfactory results when electrode array is translated along or rotated around subject's forearm for varying number of features, we recorded surface electromyography signals in 10 healthy volunteers for three types of grasp and 6 wrist movements. For feature extraction we applied principal component analysis and the feature set size varied from one to 8 principal components. We compared results of re-trained classifier with results from leave-one-out cross-validation classification procedure for three classifiers: LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis), QDA (Quadratic Discriminant Analysis), and ANN (Artificial Neural Network). Our results showed that there was no significant difference in classification accuracy when the array electrode was repositioned indicating successful classification re-training and optimal feature set selection. The results also indicate expectedly that the number of principal components plays a key role for acceptable classification accuracy ~90 %. For the largest dataset (9 hand movements), LDA and QDA outperformed ANN, while for three grasping movements ANN showed promising results. Interestingly, we showed that interaction between electrode array position and the feature set size is not statistically significant. This study emphasizes the importance of testing the interaction of factors that influence classification accuracy and classifier selection altogether with their impact independently in order to establish guiding principles for design of hand movement recognition system. Data recorded for this study are stored on Zenodo repository (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4039550).