Marco Tianyu Chen

LG
h-index1
3papers
32citations
Novelty33%
AI Score40

3 Papers

10.4LGNov 27, 2022
Deep Active Learning for Computer Vision: Past and Future

Rinyoichi Takezoe, Xu Liu, Shunan Mao et al.

As an important data selection schema, active learning emerges as the essential component when iterating an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model. It becomes even more critical given the dominance of deep neural network based models, which are composed of a large number of parameters and data hungry, in application. Despite its indispensable role for developing AI models, research on active learning is not as intensive as other research directions. In this paper, we present a review of active learning through deep active learning approaches from the following perspectives: 1) technical advancements in active learning, 2) applications of active learning in computer vision, 3) industrial systems leveraging or with potential to leverage active learning for data iteration, 4) current limitations and future research directions. We expect this paper to clarify the significance of active learning in a modern AI model manufacturing process and to bring additional research attention to active learning. By addressing data automation challenges and coping with automated machine learning systems, active learning will facilitate democratization of AI technologies by boosting model production at scale.

4.9LGMar 2
SageBwd: A Trainable Low-bit Attention

Jintao Zhang, Marco Chen, Haoxu Wang et al.

Low-bit attention, such as SageAttention, has emerged as an effective approach for accelerating model inference, but its applicability to training remains poorly understood. In prior work, we introduced SageBwd, a trainable INT8 attention that quantizes six of seven attention matrix multiplications while preserving fine-tuning performance. However, SageBwd exhibited a persistent performance gap to full-precision attention (FPA) during pre-training. In this work, we investigate why this gap occurs and demonstrate that SageBwd matches full-precision attention during pretraining. Through experiments and theoretical analysis, we reach a few important insights and conclusions: (i) QK-norm is necessary for stable training at large tokens per step, (ii) quantization errors primarily arise from the backward-pass score gradient dS, (iii) reducing tokens per step enables SageBwd to match FPA performance in pre-training, and (iv) K-smoothing remains essential for training stability, while Q-smoothing provides limited benefit during pre-training.

1.4LGFeb 1Code
SimpleGPT: Improving GPT via A Simple Normalization Strategy

Marco Chen, Xianbiao Qi, Yelin He et al.

In this work, we revisit Transformer optimization through the lens of second-order geometry and establish a direct connection between architectural design, activation scale, the Hessian matrix, and the maximum tolerable learning rate. We introduce a simple normalization strategy, termed SimpleNorm, which stabilizes intermediate activation scales by construction. Then, by analyzing the Hessian of the loss with respect to network activations, we theoretically show that SimpleNorm significantly reduces the spectral norm of the Hessian, thereby permitting larger stable learning rates. We validate our theoretical findings through extensive experiments on large GPT models at parameter scales 1B, 1.4B, 7B and 8B. Empirically, SimpleGPT, our SimpleNorm-based network, tolerates learning rates 3$\times$-10$\times$ larger than standard convention, consistently demonstrates strong optimization stability, and achieves substantially better performance than well-established baselines. Specifically, when training 7B-scale models for 60K steps, SimpleGPT achieves a training loss that is 0.08 lower than that of LLaMA2 with QKNorm, reducing the loss from 2.290 to 2.208. Our source code will be released at https://github.com/Ocram7/SimpleGPT.