Vasileios Kouliaridis

CR
3papers
40citations
Novelty17%
AI Score32

3 Papers

47.1CRMay 28
Protecting On-Device AI Inference: A Systematic Review of Attacks and Defence Mechanisms

Zisis Tsiatsikas, Alexandros Fakis, Georgios Karopoulos et al.

The need for secure and private Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) on edge and mobile devices has increased the necessity of protecting the architecture of these systems from threats to both security and privacy. With an ever-increasing number of pre-trained AI models being used on mobile platforms for client-side inference, there are rising concerns about the risks associated with the theft/extraction of AI models, adversarial attacks on AI models, and data breaches. As a result of this trend, a variety of defence mechanisms have been proposed to protect against these threats. These include Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), homomorphic encryption, obfuscation, and differential privacy, among others. However, current surveys largely focus on edge intelligence, which includes distributed training, and thus overlook security and privacy issues that are specific to on-device AI inference. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first comprehensive review of threats and corresponding defence mechanisms targeting on-device inference. Our results show that the attack and defence literature are unbalanced: approximately one quarter of the surveyed attack papers focus on Intellectual Property (IP) attacks, whereas half of the defence solutions tackle the same issue. More importantly, some attack categories have no defence paper associated to them, such as adversarial attacks that account for roughly one third of the attack literature. This asymmetry between known attacks and available mitigations highlights clear opportunities for future research on securing on-device AI inference.

CRAug 1, 2020
Dissecting contact tracing apps in the Android platform

Vasileios Kouliaridis, Georgios Kambourakis, Efstratios Chatzoglou et al.

Contact tracing has historically been used to retard the spread of infectious diseases, but if it is exercised by hand in large-scale, it is known to be a resource-intensive and quite deficient process. Nowadays, digital contact tracing has promptly emerged as an indispensable asset in the global fight against the coronavirus pandemic. The work at hand offers a meticulous study of all the official Android contact tracing apps deployed hitherto by European countries. Each app is closely scrutinized both statically and dynamically by means of dynamic instrumentation. Depending on the level of examination, static analysis results are grouped in two axes. The first encompasses permissions, API calls, and possible connections to external URLs, while the second concentrates on potential security weaknesses and vulnerabilities, including the use of trackers, in-depth manifest analysis, shared software analysis, and taint analysis. Dynamic analysis on the other hand collects data pertaining to Java classes and network traffic. The results demonstrate that while overall these apps are well-engineered, they are not free of weaknesses, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations that may ultimately put the user security and privacy at risk.

CRJul 27, 2020
Feature importance in mobile malware detection

Vasileios Kouliaridis, Georgios Kambourakis, Tao Peng

The topic of mobile malware detection on the Android platform has attracted significant attention over the last several years. However, while much research has been conducted toward mobile malware detection techniques, little attention has been devoted to feature selection and feature importance. That is, which app feature matters more when it comes to machine learning classification. After succinctly surveying all major, dated from 2012 to 2020, datasets used by state-of-the-art malware detection works in the literature, we analyse a critical mass of apps from the most contemporary and prevailing datasets, namely Drebin, VirusShare, and AndroZoo. Next, we rank the importance of app classification features pertaining to permissions and intents using the Information Gain algorithm for all the three above-mentioned datasets.