Jan C. Schulze

Jan C. Schulze, Danimir T. Doncevic, Nils Erwes et al.

Achieving real-time capability is an essential prerequisite for the industrial implementation of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). Data-driven model reduction offers a way to obtain low-order control models from complex digital twins. In particular, data-driven approaches require little expert knowledge of the particular process and its model, and provide reduced models of a well-defined generic structure. Herein, we apply our recently proposed data-driven reduction strategy based on Koopman theory [Schulze et al. (2022), Comput. Chem. Eng.] to generate a low-order control model of an air separation unit (ASU). The reduced Koopman model combines autoencoders and linear latent dynamics and is constructed using machine learning. Further, we present an NMPC implementation that uses derivative computation tailored to the fixed block structure of reduced Koopman models. Our reduction approach with tailored NMPC implementation enables real-time NMPC of an ASU at an average CPU time decrease by 98 %.

Jan C. Schulze, Alexander Mitsos

We use Koopman theory for data-driven model reduction of nonlinear dynamical systems with controls. We propose generic model structures combining delay-coordinate encoding of measurements and full-state decoding to integrate reduced Koopman modeling and state estimation. We present a deep-learning approach to train the proposed models. A case study demonstrates that our approach provides accurate control models and enables real-time capable nonlinear model predictive control of a high-purity cryogenic distillation column.

Jan C. Schulze, Alexander Mitsos

Computationally cheap yet accurate enough dynamical models are vital for real-time capable nonlinear optimization and model-based control. When given a computationally expensive high-order prediction model, a reduction to a lower-order simplified model can enable such real-time applications. Herein, we review state-of-the-art nonlinear model order reduction methods and provide a theoretical comparison of method properties. Additionally, we discuss both general-purpose methods and tailored approaches for (chemical) process systems and we identify similarities and differences between these methods. As manifold-Galerkin approaches currently do not account for inputs in the construction of the reduced state subspace, we extend these methods to dynamical systems with inputs. In a comparative case study, we apply eight established model order reduction methods to an air separation process model: POD-Galerkin, nonlinear-POD-Galerkin, manifold-Galerkin, dynamic mode decomposition, Koopman theory, manifold learning with latent predictor, compartment modeling, and model aggregation. Herein, we do not investigate hyperreduction (reduction of FLOPS). Based on our findings, we discuss strengths and weaknesses of the model order reduction methods.