P. Sperl

2papers

2 Papers

LGJan 12, 2021
Double-Adversarial Activation Anomaly Detection: Adversarial Autoencoders are Anomaly Generators

J. -P. Schulze, P. Sperl, K. Böttinger

Anomaly detection is a challenging task for machine learning algorithms due to the inherent class imbalance. It is costly and time-demanding to manually analyse the observed data, thus usually only few known anomalies if any are available. Inspired by generative models and the analysis of the hidden activations of neural networks, we introduce a novel unsupervised anomaly detection method called DA3D. Here, we use adversarial autoencoders to generate anomalous counterexamples based on the normal data only. These artificial anomalies used during training allow the detection of real, yet unseen anomalies. With our novel generative approach, we transform the unsupervised task of anomaly detection to a supervised one, which is more tractable by machine learning and especially deep learning methods. DA3D surpasses the performance of state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods in a purely data-driven way, where no domain knowledge is required.

LGAug 31, 2020
Anomaly Detection by Recombining Gated Unsupervised Experts

J. -P. Schulze, P. Sperl, K. Böttinger

Anomaly detection has been considered under several extents of prior knowledge. Unsupervised methods do not require any labelled data, whereas semi-supervised methods leverage some known anomalies. Inspired by mixture-of-experts models and the analysis of the hidden activations of neural networks, we introduce a novel data-driven anomaly detection method called ARGUE. Our method is not only applicable to unsupervised and semi-supervised environments, but also profits from prior knowledge of self-supervised settings. We designed ARGUE as a combination of dedicated expert networks, which specialise on parts of the input data. For its final decision, ARGUE fuses the distributed knowledge across the expert systems using a gated mixture-of-experts architecture. Our evaluation motivates that prior knowledge about the normal data distribution may be as valuable as known anomalies.