Aggelos Semoglou

Aggelos Semoglou, Aristidis Likas, John Pavlopoulos

Determining the number of clusters is a central challenge in unsupervised learning, where ground-truth labels are unavailable. The Silhouette coefficient is a widely used internal validation metric for this task, yet its standard micro-averaged form tends to favor larger clusters under size imbalance. Macro-averaging mitigates this bias by weighting clusters equally, but may overemphasize noise from under-represented groups. We introduce Composite Silhouette, an internal criterion for cluster-count selection that aggregates evidence across repeated subsampled clusterings rather than relying on a single partition. For each subsample, micro- and macro-averaged Silhouette scores are combined through an adaptive convex weight determined by their normalized discrepancy and smoothed by a bounded nonlinearity; the final score is then obtained by averaging these subsample-level composites. We establish key properties of the criterion and derive finite-sample concentration guarantees for its subsampling estimate. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that Composite Silhouette effectively reconciles the strengths of micro- and macro-averaging, yielding more accurate recovery of the ground-truth number of clusters.

Aggelos Semoglou, John Pavlopoulos

Clustering is widely used for unsupervised structure discovery, yet it offers limited insight into how reliable each individual assignment is. Diagnostics, such as convergence behavior or objective values, may reflect global quality, but they do not indicate whether particular instances are assigned confidently, especially for initialization-sensitive algorithms like k-means. This assignment-level instability can undermine both accuracy and robustness. Ensemble approaches improve global consistency by aggregating multiple runs, but they typically lack tools for quantifying pointwise confidence in a way that combines cross-run agreement with geometric support from the learned cluster structure. We introduce CAKE (Confidence in Assignments via K-partition Ensembles), a framework that evaluates each point using two complementary statistics computed over a clustering ensemble: assignment stability and consistency of local geometric fit. These are combined into a single, interpretable score in [0,1]. Our theoretical analysis shows that CAKE remains effective under noise and separates stable from unstable points. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets indicate that CAKE effectively highlights ambiguous points and stable core members, providing a confidence ranking that can guide filtering or prioritization to improve clustering quality.

Aggelos Semoglou, Aristidis Likas, John Pavlopoulos

Clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning task with numerous applications across diverse fields. Popular algorithms such as k-means often struggle with outliers or imbalances, leading to distorted centroids and suboptimal partitions. We introduce K-Sil, a silhouette-guided refinement of the k-means algorithm that weights points based on their silhouette scores, prioritizing well-clustered instances while suppressing borderline or noisy regions. The algorithm emphasizes user-specified silhouette aggregation metrics: macro-, micro-averaged or a combination, through self-tuning weighting schemes, supported by appropriate sampling strategies and scalable approximations. These components ensure computational efficiency and adaptability to diverse dataset geometries. Theoretical guarantees establish centroid convergence, and empirical validation on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrates statistically significant improvements in silhouette scores over k-means and two other instance-weighted k-means variants. These results establish K-Sil as a principled alternative for applications demanding high-quality, well-separated clusters.