Jalves Nicacio

Jalves Nicacio, Fabio Petrillo

Communication between practitioners is essential for the system's quality in the DevOps context. To improve this communication, practitioners often use informal diagrams to represent the components of a system. However, as systems evolve, it is a challenge to synchronize diagrams with production environments consistently. Hence, the inconsistency of architectural diagrams can affect communication between practitioner and their understanding of systems. In this paper, we propose the use of system descriptors to improve deployment diagram consistency. We state two main hypotheses: (1) if an architectural diagram is generated from a valid system descriptor, then the diagram is consistent; (2) if a valid system descriptor is generated from an architectural diagram, then the diagram is consistent. We report a case study to explore our hypotheses. Furthermore, we constructed a system descriptor from the Netflix deployment diagram, and we applied our tool to generate a new architectural diagram. Finally, we compare the original and generated diagrams to evaluate our proposal. Our case study shows all Docker compose description elements can be graphically represented in the generated architectural diagram, and the generated diagram does not present inconsistent aspects of the original diagram. Thus, our preliminary results lead to further evaluation in controlled and empirical experiments to test our hypotheses.

Jalves Nicacio, Fabio Petrillo

Communication between practitioners is essential for product quality in the DevOps context. This communication often takes place through deployment diagrams of a system under development. However, it is common diagrams to become ambiguous or inconsistent as the system progresses and goes to a continuous delivery pipeline or production. Moreover, diagrams could not follow the evolution of systems, and it is challenging to associate diagrams to production. In this paper, we propose the use of system descriptors to address the ambiguity of deployment diagrams. We state three main hypotheses (1) if a deployment diagram is generated from a valid system descriptor then the diagram is unambiguous; (2) if a valid system descriptor is generated from a deployment diagram then the descriptor is unambiguous; (3) if a diagram $μ$ generated from a descriptor $A$ is unambiguous and if a descriptor $B$ is generated from the diagram $μ$ equally unambiguous then descriptors $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. We report a case study to test our hypotheses. We constructed a system descriptor from Netflix deployment diagram, and we applied our tool to generate a new deployment diagram. Finally, we compare the original and generated diagrams to evaluate our proposal. Our case study shows the generated deployment diagrams are graphically equivalent to system descriptors and eliminated ambiguous aspects of the original diagram. Thus, our preliminary results lead to further evaluation in controlled and empirical experiments to test our hypotheses conclusively.