Tim De Jong

Yu Zhang, Martijn Tennekes, Tim de Jong et al.

Quality-sensitive applications of machine learning (ML) require quality assurance (QA) by humans before the predictions of an ML model can be deployed. QA for ML (QA4ML) interfaces require users to view a large amount of data and perform many interactions to correct errors made by the ML model. An optimized user interface (UI) can significantly reduce interaction costs. While UI optimization can be informed by user studies evaluating design options, this approach is not scalable because there are typically numerous small variations that can affect the efficiency of a QA4ML interface. Hence, we propose using simulation to evaluate and aid the optimization of QA4ML interfaces. In particular, we focus on simulating the combined effects of human intelligence in initiating appropriate interaction commands and machine intelligence in providing algorithmic assistance for accelerating QA4ML processes. As QA4ML is usually labor-intensive, we use the simulated task completion time as the metric for UI optimization under different interface and algorithm setups. We demonstrate the usage of this UI design method in several QA4ML applications.

Tim De Jong, Stefano Bromuri, Xi Chang et al.

This report presents the results of the DeepSolaris project that was carried out under the ESS action 'Merging Geostatistics and Geospatial Information in Member States'. During the project several deep learning algorithms were evaluated to detect solar panels in remote sensing data. The aim of the project was to evaluate whether deep learning models could be developed, that worked across different member states in the European Union. Two remote sensing data sources were considered: aerial images on the one hand, and satellite images on the other. Two flavours of deep learning models were evaluated: classification models and object detection models. For the evaluation of the deep learning models we used a cross-site evaluation approach: the deep learning models where trained in one geographical area and then evaluated on a different geographical area, previously unseen by the algorithm. The cross-site evaluation was furthermore carried out twice: deep learning models trained on he Netherlands were evaluated on Germany and vice versa. While the deep learning models were able to detect solar panels successfully, false detection remained a problem. Moreover, model performance decreased dramatically when evaluated in a cross-border fashion. Hence, training a model that performs reliably across different countries in the European Union is a challenging task. That being said, the models detected quite a share of solar panels not present in current solar panel registers and therefore can already be used as-is to help reduced manual labor in checking these registers.