Jun Otsuka

Jun Otsuka

This paper examines the connections among various approaches to understanding concepts in philosophy, cognitive science, and machine learning, with a particular focus on their mathematical nature. By categorizing these approaches into Abstractionism, the Similarity Approach, the Functional Approach, and the Invariance Approach, the study highlights how each framework provides a distinct mathematical perspective for modeling concepts. The synthesis of these approaches bridges philosophical theories and contemporary machine learning models, providing a comprehensive framework for future research. This work emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary dialogue, aiming to enrich our understanding of the complex relationship between human cognition and artificial intelligence.

Jun Otsuka, Hayato Saigo

We develop a category-theoretic criterion for determining the equivalence of causal models having different but homomorphic directed acyclic graphs over discrete variables. Following Jacobs et al. (2019), we define a causal model as a probabilistic interpretation of a causal string diagram, i.e., a functor from the ``syntactic'' category $\textsf{Syn}_G$ of graph $G$ to the category $\textsf{Stoch}$ of finite sets and stochastic matrices. The equivalence of causal models is then defined in terms of a natural transformation or isomorphism between two such functors, which we call a $Φ$-abstraction and $Φ$-equivalence, respectively. It is shown that when one model is a $Φ$-abstraction of another, the intervention calculus of the former can be consistently translated into that of the latter. We also identify the condition under which a model accommodates a $Φ$-abstraction, when transformations are deterministic.