Saddam Mukta

CL
h-index11
4papers
1citation
Novelty28%
AI Score39

4 Papers

CVMar 6
Remote Sensing Image Classification Using Deep Ensemble Learning

Niful Islam, Md. Rayhan Ahmed, Nur Mohammad Fahad et al.

Remote sensing imagery plays a crucial role in many applications and requires accurate computerized classification techniques. Reliable classification is essential for transforming raw imagery into structured and usable information. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are mostly used for image classification, they excel at local feature extraction, but struggle to capture global contextual information. Vision Transformers (ViTs) address this limitation through self attention mechanisms that model long-range dependencies. Integrating CNNs and ViTs, therefore, leads to better performance than standalone architectures. However, the use of additional CNN and ViT components does not lead to further performance improvement and instead introduces a bottleneck caused by redundant feature representations. In this research, we propose a fusion model that combines the strengths of CNNs and ViTs for remote sensing image classification. To overcome the performance bottleneck, the proposed approach trains four independent fusion models that integrate CNN and ViT backbones and combine their outputs at the final prediction stage through ensembling. The proposed method achieves accuracy rates of 98.10 percent, 94.46 percent, and 95.45 percent on the UC Merced, RSSCN7, and MSRSI datasets, respectively. These results outperform competing architectures and highlight the effectiveness of the proposed solution, particularly due to its efficient use of computational resources during training.

CLDec 18, 2025
Mitigating Hallucinations in Healthcare LLMs with Granular Fact-Checking and Domain-Specific Adaptation

Musarrat Zeba, Abdullah Al Mamun, Kishoar Jahan Tithee et al.

In healthcare, it is essential for any LLM-generated output to be reliable and accurate, particularly in cases involving decision-making and patient safety. However, the outputs are often unreliable in such critical areas due to the risk of hallucinated outputs from the LLMs. To address this issue, we propose a fact-checking module that operates independently of any LLM, along with a domain-specific summarization model designed to minimize hallucination rates. Our model is fine-tuned using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRa) on the MIMIC III dataset and is paired with the fact-checking module, which uses numerical tests for correctness and logical checks at a granular level through discrete logic in natural language processing (NLP) to validate facts against electronic health records (EHRs). We trained the LLM model on the full MIMIC-III dataset. For evaluation of the fact-checking module, we sampled 104 summaries, extracted them into 3,786 propositions, and used these as facts. The fact-checking module achieves a precision of 0.8904, a recall of 0.8234, and an F1-score of 0.8556. Additionally, the LLM summary model achieves a ROUGE-1 score of 0.5797 and a BERTScore of 0.9120 for summary quality.

CLNov 5, 2025
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Bioinformatics: A Systematic Review of Models, Applications, and Methodological Advances

Riasad Alvi, Sayeem Been Zaman, Wasimul Karim et al.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become a transformative approach in bioinformatics that often enables advancements in genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, structural biology, and drug discovery. To systematically identify and evaluate these growing developments, this review proposed six research questions (RQs), according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis methods. The objective is to evaluate impactful GenAI strategies in methodological advancement, predictive performance, and specialization, and to identify promising approaches for advanced modeling, data-intensive discovery, and integrative biological analysis. RQ1 highlights diverse applications across multiple bioinformatics subfields (sequence analysis, molecular design, and integrative data modeling), which demonstrate superior performance over traditional methods through pattern recognition and output generation. RQ2 reveals that adapted specialized model architectures outperformed general-purpose models, an advantage attributed to targeted pretraining and context-aware strategies. RQ3 identifies significant benefits in the bioinformatics domains, focusing on molecular analysis and data integration, which improves accuracy and reduces errors in complex analysis. RQ4 indicates improvements in structural modeling, functional prediction, and synthetic data generation, validated by established benchmarks. RQ5 suggests the main constraints, such as the lack of scalability and biases in data that impact generalizability, and proposes future directions focused on robust evaluation and biologically grounded modeling. RQ6 examines that molecular datasets (such as UniProtKB and ProteinNet12), cellular datasets (such as CELLxGENE and GTEx) and textual resources (such as PubMedQA and OMIM) broadly support the training and generalization of GenAI models.

PFMar 21
Democratizing AI: A Comparative Study in Deep Learning Efficiency and Future Trends in Computational Processing

Lisan Al Amin, Md Ismail Hossain, Rupak Kumar Das et al.

The exponential growth in data has intensified the demand for computational power to train large-scale deep learning models. However, the rapid growth in model size and complexity raises concerns about equal and fair access to computational resources, particularly under increasing energy and infrastructure constraints. GPUs have emerged as essential for accelerating such workloads. This study benchmarks four deep learning models (Conv6, VGG16, ResNet18, CycleGAN) using TensorFlow and PyTorch on Intel Xeon CPUs and NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPUs. Our experiments demonstrate that, on average, GPU training achieves speedups ranging from 11x to 246x depending on model complexity, with lightweight models (Conv6) showing the highest acceleration (246x), mid-sized models (VGG16, ResNet18) achieving 51-116x speedups, and complex generative models (CycleGAN) reaching 11x improvements compared to CPU training. Additionally, in our PyTorch vs. TensorFlow comparison, we observed that TensorFlow's kernel-fusion optimizations reduce inference latency by approximately 15%. We also analyze GPU memory usage trends and projecting requirements through 2025 using polynomial regression. Our findings highlight that while GPUs are essential for sustaining AI's growth, democratized and shared access to GPU resources is critical for enabling research innovation across institutions with limited computational budgets.