Robert Moore

2papers

2 Papers

SYNov 20, 2017
Finite Horizon Robustness Analysis of LTV Systems Using Integral Quadratic Constraints

Peter Seiler, Robert Moore, Chris Meissen et al.

The goal of this paper is to assess the robustness of an uncertain linear time-varying (LTV) system on a finite time horizon. The uncertain system is modeled as a connection of a known LTV system and a perturbation. The input/output behavior of the perturbation is described by time-domain, integral quadratic constraints (IQCs). Typical notions of robustness, e.g. nominal stability and gain/phase margins, can be insufficient for finite-horizon analysis. Instead, this paper focuses on robust induced gains and bounds on the reachable set of states. Sufficient conditions to compute robust performance bounds are formulated using dissipation inequalities and IQCs. The analysis conditions are provided in two equivalent forms as Riccati differential equations and differential linear matrix inequalities. A computational approach is provided that leverages both forms of the analysis conditions. The approach is demonstrated with two examples

CLOct 5, 2020
Effects of Naturalistic Variation in Goal-Oriented Dialog

Jatin Ganhotra, Robert Moore, Sachindra Joshi et al.

Existing benchmarks used to evaluate the performance of end-to-end neural dialog systems lack a key component: natural variation present in human conversations. Most datasets are constructed through crowdsourcing, where the crowd workers follow a fixed template of instructions while enacting the role of a user/agent. This results in straight-forward, somewhat routine, and mostly trouble-free conversations, as crowd workers do not think to represent the full range of actions that occur naturally with real users. In this work, we investigate the impact of naturalistic variation on two goal-oriented datasets: bAbI dialog task and Stanford Multi-Domain Dataset (SMD). We also propose new and more effective testbeds for both datasets, by introducing naturalistic variation by the user. We observe that there is a significant drop in performance (more than 60% in Ent. F1 on SMD and 85% in per-dialog accuracy on bAbI task) of recent state-of-the-art end-to-end neural methods such as BossNet and GLMP on both datasets.