Christoph Ledermann

Tom P. Huck, Christoph Ledermann, Torsten Kröger

We introduce a novel simulation-based approach to identify hazards that result from unexpected worker behavior in human-robot collaboration. Simulation-based safety testing must take into account the fact that human behavior is variable and that human error can occur. When only the expected worker behavior is simulated, critical hazards can remain undiscovered. On the other hand, simulating all possible worker behaviors is computationally infeasible. This raises the problem of how to find interesting (i.e., potentially hazardous) worker behaviors given a limited number of simulation runs. We frame this as a search problem in the space of possible worker behaviors. Because this search space can get quite complex, we introduce the following measures: (1) Search space restriction based on workflow-constraints, (2) prioritization of behaviors based on how far they deviate from the nominal behavior, and (3) the use of a risk metric to guide the search towards high-risk behaviors which are more likely to expose hazards. We demonstrate the approach in a collaborative workflow scenario that involves a human worker, a robot arm, and a mobile robot.

Tom P. Huck, Christoph Ledermann, Torsten Kröger

During the planning phase of industrial robot workplaces, hazard analyses are required so that potential hazards for human workers can be identified and appropriate safety measures can be implemented. Existing hazard analysis methods use human reasoning, checklists and/or abstract system models, which limit the level of detail. We propose a new approach that frames hazard analysis as a search problem in a dynamic simulation environment. Our goal is to identify workplace hazards by searching for simulation sequences that result in hazardous situations. We solve this search problem by placing virtual humans into workplace simulation models. These virtual humans act in an adversarial manner: They learn to provoke unsafe situations, and thereby uncover workplace hazards. Although this approach cannot replace a thorough hazard analysis, it can help uncover hazards that otherwise may have been overlooked, especially in early development stages. Thus, it helps to prevent costly re-designs at later development stages. For validation, we performed hazard analyses in six different example scenarios that reflect typical industrial robot workplaces.

Tom P. Huck, Christoph Ledermann, Torsten Kröger

Industrial human-robot collaborative systems must be validated thoroughly with regard to safety. The sooner potential hazards for workers can be exposed, the less costly is the implementation of necessary changes. Due to the complexity of robot systems, safety flaws often stay hidden, especially at early design stages, when a physical implementation is not yet available for testing. Simulation-based testing is a possible way to identify hazards in an early stage. However, creating simulation conditions in which hazards become observable can be difficult. Brute-force or Monte-Carlo-approaches are often not viable for hazard identification, due to large search spaces. This work addresses this problem by using a human model and an optimization algorithm to generate high-risk human behavior in simulation, thereby exposing potential hazards. A proof of concept is shown in an application example where the method is used to find hazards in an industrial robot cell.