Stephen Cranefield

Jinyong Hou, Jeremiah D. Deng, Stephen Cranefield et al.

To successfully apply trained neural network models to new domains, powerful transfer learning solutions are essential. We propose to introduce a novel cross-domain latent modulation mechanism to a variational autoencoder framework so as to achieve effective transfer learning. Our key idea is to procure deep representations from one data domain and use it to influence the reparameterization of the latent variable of another domain. Specifically, deep representations of the source and target domains are first extracted by a unified inference model and aligned by employing gradient reversal. The learned deep representations are then cross-modulated to the latent encoding of the alternative domain, where consistency constraints are also applied. In the empirical validation that includes a number of transfer learning benchmark tasks for unsupervised domain adaptation and image-to-image translation, our model demonstrates competitive performance, which is also supported by evidence obtained from visualization.

Anushka Debnath, Stephen Cranefield, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu et al.

Trust plays a pivotal role in enabling effective cooperation, reducing uncertainty, and guiding decision-making in both human interactions and multi-agent systems. Although it is significant, there is limited understanding of how large language models (LLMs) internally conceptualize and reason about trust. This work presents a white-box analysis of trust representation in EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B, using contrastive prompting to generate embedding vectors within the activation space of the LLM for diadic trust and related interpersonal relationship attributes. We first identified trust-related concepts from five established human trust models. We then determined a threshold for significant conceptual alignment by computing pairwise cosine similarities across 60 general emotional concepts. Then we measured the cosine similarities between the LLM's internal representation of trust and the derived trust-related concepts. Our results show that the internal trust representation of EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B aligns most closely with the Castelfranchi socio-cognitive model, followed by the Marsh Model. These findings indicate that LLMs encode socio-cognitive constructs in their activation space in ways that support meaningful comparative analyses, inform theories of social cognition, and support the design of human-AI collaborative systems.

Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Surangika Ranathunga, Stephen Cranefield

Software agents, both human and computational, do not exist in isolation and often need to collaborate or coordinate with others to achieve their goals. In human society, social mechanisms such as norms ensure efficient functioning, and these techniques have been adopted by researchers in multi-agent systems (MAS) to create socially aware agents. However, traditional techniques have limitations, such as operating in limited environments often using brittle symbolic reasoning. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a promising solution, providing a rich and expressive vocabulary for norms and enabling norm-capable agents that can perform a range of tasks such as norm discovery, normative reasoning and decision-making. This paper examines the potential of LLM-based agents to acquire normative capabilities, drawing on recent Natural Language Processing (NLP) and LLM research. We present our vision for creating normative LLM agents. In particular, we discuss how the recently proposed "LLM agent" approaches can be extended to implement such normative LLM agents. We also highlight challenges in this emerging field. This paper thus aims to foster collaboration between MAS, NLP and LLM researchers in order to advance the field of normative agents.

Stephen Cranefield, Nir Oren

AI systems are becoming increasingly complex, ubiquitous and autonomous, leading to increasing concerns about their impacts on individuals and society. In response, researchers have begun investigating how to ensure that the methods underlying AI decision-making are transparent and their decisions are explainable to people and conformant to human values and ethical principles. As part of this research thrust, the need for accountability within AI systems has been noted, but this notion has proven elusive to define; we aim to address this issue in the current paper. Unlike much recent work, we do not address accountability within the human organisational processes of developing and deploying AI; rather we consider what it would it mean for the agents within a multi-agent system (MAS), potentially including human agents, to be accountable to other agents or to have others accountable to them. In this work, we make the following contributions: we provide an in-depth survey of existing work on accountability in multiple disciplines, seeking to identify a coherent definition of the concept; we give a realistic example of a multi-agent system application domain that illustrates the benefits of enabling agents to follow accountability processes, and we identify a set of research challenges for the MAS community in building accountable agents, sketching out some initial solutions to these, thereby laying out a road-map for future research. Our focus is on laying the groundwork to enable autonomous elements within open socio-technical systems to take part in accountability processes.

Anushka Debnath, Stephen Cranefield, Emiliano Lorini et al.

In human society, trust is an essential component of social attitude that helps build and maintain long-term, healthy relationships which creates a strong foundation for cooperation, enabling individuals to work together effectively and achieve shared goals. As many human interactions occur through electronic means such as using mobile apps, the potential arises for AI systems to assist users in understanding the social state of their relationships. In this paper we investigate the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason about trust between two individuals in an environment which requires fostering trust relationships. We also assess whether LLMs are capable of inducing trust by role-playing one party in a trust based interaction and planning actions which can instil trust.

Jithin Cheriyan, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield

Software Engineering (SE) communities such as Stack Overflow have become unwelcoming, particularly through members' use of offensive language. Research has shown that offensive language drives users away from active engagement within these platforms. This work aims to explore this issue more broadly by investigating the nature of offensive language in comments posted by users in four prominent SE platforms - GitHub, Gitter, Slack and Stack Overflow (SO). It proposes an approach to detect and classify offensive language in SE communities by adopting natural language processing and deep learning techniques. Further, a Conflict Reduction System (CRS), which identifies offence and then suggests what changes could be made to minimize offence has been proposed. Beyond showing the prevalence of offensive language in over 1 million comments from four different communities which ranges from 0.07% to 0.43%, our results show promise in successful detection and classification of such language. The CRS system has the potential to drastically reduce manual moderation efforts to detect and reduce offence in SE communities.

Jinyong Hou, Jeremiah D. Deng, Stephen Cranefield et al.

We propose a cross-domain latent modulation mechanism within a variational autoencoders (VAE) framework to enable improved transfer learning. Our key idea is to procure deep representations from one data domain and use it as perturbation to the reparameterization of the latent variable in another domain. Specifically, deep representations of the source and target domains are first extracted by a unified inference model and aligned by employing gradient reversal. Second, the learned deep representations are cross-modulated to the latent encoding of the alternate domain. The consistency between the reconstruction from the modulated latent encoding and the generation using deep representation samples is then enforced in order to produce inter-class alignment in the latent space. We apply the proposed model to a number of transfer learning tasks including unsupervised domain adaptation and image-toimage translation. Experimental results show that our model gives competitive performance.

Jinyong Hou, Xuejie Ding, Stephen Cranefield et al.

Current deep domain adaptation methods used in computer vision have mainly focused on learning discriminative and domain-invariant features across different domains. In this paper, we present a novel "deep adversarial transition learning" (DATL) framework that bridges the domain gap by projecting the source and target domains into intermediate, transitional spaces through the employment of adjustable, cross-grafted generative network stacks and effective adversarial learning between transitions. Specifically, we construct variational auto-encoders (VAE) for the two domains, and form bidirectional transitions by cross-grafting the VAEs' decoder stacks. Furthermore, generative adversarial networks (GAN) are employed for domain adaptation, mapping the target domain data to the known label space of the source domain. The overall adaptation process hence consists of three phases: feature representation learning by VAEs, transitions generation, and transitions alignment by GANs. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the art on a number of unsupervised domain adaptation benchmarks.

Jithin Cheriyan, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield

Norms are behavioral expectations in communities. Online communities are also expected to abide by the rules and regulations that are expressed in the code of conduct of a system. Even though community authorities continuously prompt their users to follow the regulations, it is observed that hate speech and abusive language usage are on the rise. In this paper, we quantify and analyze the patterns of violations of normative behaviour among the users of Stack Overflow (SO) - a well-known technical question-answer site for professionals and enthusiast programmers, while posting a comment. Even though the site has been dedicated to technical problem solving and debugging, hate speech as well as posting offensive comments make the community "toxic". By identifying and minimising various patterns of norm violations in different SO communities, the community would become less toxic and thereby the community can engage more effectively in its goal of knowledge sharing. Moreover, through automatic detection of such comments, the authors can be warned by the moderators, so that it is less likely to be repeated, thereby the reputation of the site and community can be improved. Based on the comments extracted from two different data sources on SO, this work first presents a taxonomy of norms that are violated. Second, it demonstrates the sanctions for certain norm violations. Third, it proposes a recommendation system that can be used to warn users that they are about to violate a norm. This can help achieve norm adherence in online communities.

Rohit Murali, Suravi Patnaik, Stephen Cranefield

Researchers have long been interested in the role that norms can play in governing agent actions in multi-agent systems. Much work has been done on formalising normative concepts from human society and adapting them for the government of open software systems, and on the simulation of normative processes in human and artificial societies. However, there has been comparatively little work on applying normative MAS mechanisms to understanding the norms in human society. This work investigates this issue in the context of international politics. Using the GDELT dataset, containing machine-encoded records of international events extracted from news reports, we extracted bilateral sequences of inter-country events and applied a Bayesian norm mining mechanism to identify norms that best explained the observed behaviour. A statistical evaluation showed that the normative model fitted the data significantly better than a probabilistic discrete event model.

Jinyong Hou, Xuejie Ding, Jeremiah D. Deng et al.

Current deep domain adaptation methods used in computer vision have mainly focused on learning discriminative and domain-invariant features across different domains. In this paper, we present a novel approach that bridges the domain gap by projecting the source and target domains into a common association space through an unsupervised ``cross-grafted representation stacking'' (CGRS) mechanism. Specifically, we construct variational auto-encoders (VAE) for the two domains, and form bidirectional associations by cross-grafting the VAEs' decoder stacks. Furthermore, generative adversarial networks (GAN) are employed for label alignment (LA), mapping the target domain data to the known label space of the source domain. The overall adaptation process hence consists of three phases: feature representation learning by VAEs, association generation, and association label alignment by GANs. Experimental results demonstrate that our CGRS-LA approach outperforms the state-of-the-art on a number of unsupervised domain adaptation benchmarks.