Kexin Ding

Kexin Ding, Mu Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas et al.

Survival outcome assessment is challenging and inherently associated with multiple clinical factors (e.g., imaging and genomics biomarkers) in cancer. Enabling multimodal analytics promises to reveal novel predictive patterns of patient outcomes. In this study, we propose a multimodal transformer (PathOmics) integrating pathology and genomics insights into colon-related cancer survival prediction. We emphasize the unsupervised pretraining to capture the intrinsic interaction between tissue microenvironments in gigapixel whole slide images (WSIs) and a wide range of genomics data (e.g., mRNA-sequence, copy number variant, and methylation). After the multimodal knowledge aggregation in pretraining, our task-specific model finetuning could expand the scope of data utility applicable to both multi- and single-modal data (e.g., image- or genomics-only). We evaluate our approach on both TCGA colon and rectum cancer cohorts, showing that the proposed approach is competitive and outperforms state-of-the-art studies. Finally, our approach is desirable to utilize the limited number of finetuned samples towards data-efficient analytics for survival outcome prediction. The code is available at https://github.com/Cassie07/PathOmics.

Zheling Tan, Kexin Ding, Jin Gao et al.

Foundational models (FMs) have made significant strides in the healthcare domain. Yet the data silo challenge and privacy concern remain in healthcare systems, hindering safe medical data sharing and collaborative model development among institutions. The collection and curation of scalable clinical datasets increasingly become the bottleneck for training strong FMs. In this study, we propose Medical Foundation Models Merging (MedForge), a cooperative framework enabling a community-driven medical foundation model development, meanwhile preventing the information leakage of raw patient data and mitigating synchronization model development issues across clinical institutions. MedForge offers a bottom-up model construction mechanism by flexibly merging task-specific Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) modules, which can adapt to downstream tasks while retaining original model parameters. Through an asynchronous LoRA module integration scheme, the resulting composite model can progressively enhance its comprehensive performance on various clinical tasks. MedForge shows strong performance on multiple clinical datasets (e.g., breast cancer, lung cancer, and colon cancer) collected from different institutions. Our major findings highlight the value of collaborative foundation models in advancing multi-center clinical collaboration effectively and cohesively. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/TanZheling/MedForge.

Kexin Ding, Mu Zhou, Akshay Chaudhari et al.

The wide exploration of large language models (LLMs) raises the awareness of alignment between healthcare stakeholder preferences and model outputs. This alignment becomes a crucial foundation to empower the healthcare workflow effectively, safely, and responsibly. Yet the varying behaviors of LLMs may not always match with healthcare stakeholders' knowledge, demands, and values. To enable a human-AI alignment, healthcare stakeholders will need to perform essential roles in guiding and enhancing the performance of LLMs. Human professionals must participate in the entire life cycle of adopting LLM in healthcare, including training data curation, model training, and inference. In this review, we discuss the approaches, tools, and applications of alignments between healthcare stakeholders and LLMs. We demonstrate that LLMs can better follow human values by properly enhancing healthcare knowledge integration, task understanding, and human guidance. We provide outlooks on enhancing the alignment between humans and LLMs to build trustworthy real-world healthcare applications.