Dishant Goyal

Dishant Goyal, Ragesh Jaiswal

In this work, we study a range of constrained versions of the $k$-supplier and $k$-center problems such as: capacitated, fault-tolerant, fair, etc. These problems fall under a broad framework of constrained clustering. A unified framework for constrained clustering was proposed by Ding and Xu [SODA 2015] in context of the $k$-median and $k$-means objectives. In this work, we extend this framework to the $k$-supplier and $k$-center objectives. This unified framework allows us to obtain results simultaneously for the following constrained versions of the $k$-supplier problem: $r$-gather, $r$-capacity, balanced, chromatic, fault-tolerant, strongly private, $\ell$-diversity, and fair $k$-supplier problems, with and without outliers. We obtain the following results: We give $3$ and $2$ approximation algorithms for the constrained $k$-supplier and $k$-center problems, respectively, with $\mathsf{FPT}$ running time $k^{O(k)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $n = |C \cup L|$. Moreover, these approximation guarantees are tight; that is, for any constant $ε>0$, no algorithm can achieve $(3-ε)$ and $(2-ε)$ approximation guarantees for the constrained $k$-supplier and $k$-center problems in $\mathsf{FPT}$ time, assuming $\mathsf{FPT} \neq \mathsf{W}[2]$. Furthermore, we study these constrained problems in outlier setting. Our algorithm gives $3$ and $2$ approximation guarantees for the constrained outlier $k$-supplier and $k$-center problems, respectively, with $\mathsf{FPT}$ running time $(k+m)^{O(k)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $n = |C \cup L|$ and $m$ is the number of outliers.

Dishant Goyal, Ragesh Jaiswal

In this work, we study the socially fair $k$-median/$k$-means problem. We are given a set of points $P$ in a metric space $\mathcal{X}$ with a distance function $d(.,.)$. There are $\ell$ groups: $P_1,\dotsc,P_{\ell} \subseteq P$. We are also given a set $F$ of feasible centers in $\mathcal{X}$. The goal in the socially fair $k$-median problem is to find a set $C \subseteq F$ of $k$ centers that minimizes the maximum average cost over all the groups. That is, find $C$ that minimizes the objective function $Φ(C,P) \equiv \max_{j} \Big\{ \sum_{x \in P_j} d(C,x)/|P_j| \Big\}$, where $d(C,x)$ is the distance of $x$ to the closest center in $C$. The socially fair $k$-means problem is defined similarly by using squared distances, i.e., $d^{2}(.,.)$ instead of $d(.,.)$. The current best approximation guarantee for both the problems is $O\left( \frac{\log \ell}{\log \log \ell} \right)$ due to Makarychev and Vakilian [COLT 2021]. In this work, we study the fixed parameter tractability of the problems with respect to parameter $k$. We design $(3+\varepsilon)$ and $(9 + \varepsilon)$ approximation algorithms for the socially fair $k$-median and $k$-means problems, respectively, in FPT (fixed parameter tractable) time $f(k,\varepsilon) \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $f(k,\varepsilon) = (k/\varepsilon)^{{O}(k)}$ and $n = |P \cup F|$. Furthermore, we show that if Gap-ETH holds, then better approximation guarantees are not possible in FPT time.

Anup Bhattacharya, Dishant Goyal, Ragesh Jaiswal

The Euclidean $k$-median problem is defined in the following manner: given a set $\mathcal{X}$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, and an integer $k$, find a set $C \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$ of $k$ points (called centers) such that the cost function $Φ(C,\mathcal{X}) \equiv \sum_{x \in \mathcal{X}} \min_{c \in C} \|x-c\|_{2}$ is minimized. The Euclidean $k$-means problem is defined similarly by replacing the distance with squared distance in the cost function. Various hardness of approximation results are known for the Euclidean $k$-means problem. However, no hardness of approximation results were known for the Euclidean $k$-median problem. In this work, assuming the unique games conjecture (UGC), we provide the first hardness of approximation result for the Euclidean $k$-median problem. Furthermore, we study the hardness of approximation for the Euclidean $k$-means/$k$-median problems in the bi-criteria setting where an algorithm is allowed to choose more than $k$ centers. That is, bi-criteria approximation algorithms are allowed to output $βk$ centers (for constant $β>1$) and the approximation ratio is computed with respect to the optimal $k$-means/$k$-median cost. In this setting, we show the first hardness of approximation result for the Euclidean $k$-median problem for any $β< 1.015$, assuming UGC. We also show a similar bi-criteria hardness of approximation result for the Euclidean $k$-means problem with a stronger bound of $β< 1.28$, again assuming UGC.