Eli J. Cornblath

Eli J. Cornblath, Evelyn Tang, Graham L. Baum et al.

Executive function emerges late in development and displays different developmental trends in males and females. Sex differences in executive function in youth have been linked to vulnerability to psychopathology as well as to behaviors that impinge on health. Yet, the neurobiological basis of these differences is not well understood. Here we test the hypothesis that sex differences in executive function in youth stem from sex differences in the controllability of structural brain networks as they rewire over development. Combining methods from network neuroscience and network control theory, we characterize the network control properties of structural brain networks estimated from diffusion imaging data acquired in males and females in a sample of 882 youth aged 8-22 years. We summarize the control properties of these networks by estimating average and modal controllability, two statistics that probe the ease with which brain areas can drive the network towards easy- versus difficult-to-reach states. We find that females have higher modal controllability in frontal, parietal, and subcortical regions while males have higher average controllability in frontal and subcortical regions. Furthermore, average controllability values in the medial frontal cortex and subcortex, both higher in males, are negatively related to executive function. Finally, we find that average controllability predicts sex-dependent individual differences in activation during an n-back working memory task. Taken together, our findings support the notion that sex differences in the controllability of structural brain networks can partially explain sex differences in executive function. Controllability of structural brain networks also predicts features of task-relevant activation, suggesting the potential for controllability to represent context-specific constraints on network state more generally.

Erfan Nozari, Maxwell A. Bertolero, Jennifer Stiso et al.

A central challenge in the computational modeling of neural dynamics is the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. At the level of individual neurons, nonlinear dynamics are both experimentally established and essential for neuronal functioning. An implicit assumption has thus formed that an accurate computational model of whole-brain dynamics must also be highly nonlinear, whereas linear models may provide a first-order approximation. Here, we provide a rigorous and data-driven investigation of this hypothesis at the level of whole-brain blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) and macroscopic field potential dynamics by leveraging the theory of system identification. Using functional MRI (fMRI) and intracranial EEG (iEEG), we model the resting state activity of 700 subjects in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and 122 subjects from the Restoring Active Memory (RAM) project using state-of-the-art linear and nonlinear model families. We assess relative model fit using predictive power, computational complexity, and the extent of residual dynamics unexplained by the model. Contrary to our expectations, linear auto-regressive models achieve the best measures across all three metrics, eliminating the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. To understand and explain this linearity, we highlight four properties of macroscopic neurodynamics which can counteract or mask microscopic nonlinear dynamics: averaging over space, averaging over time, observation noise, and limited data samples. Whereas the latter two are technological limitations and can improve in the future, the former two are inherent to aggregated macroscopic brain activity. Our results, together with the unparalleled interpretability of linear models, can greatly facilitate our understanding of macroscopic neural dynamics and the principled design of model-based interventions for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.