Matthew Malencia

Benjamin Hudson, Qingbiao Li, Matthew Malencia et al.

Solutions to the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) have practical applications to processes in transportation, logistics, and automation, yet must be computed with minimal delay to satisfy the real-time nature of the underlying tasks. However, solving large TSP instances quickly without sacrificing solution quality remains challenging for current approximate algorithms. To close this gap, we present a hybrid data-driven approach for solving the TSP based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Guided Local Search (GLS). Our model predicts the regret of including each edge of the problem graph in the solution; GLS uses these predictions in conjunction with the original problem graph to find solutions. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach converges to optimal solutions at a faster rate than three recent learning based approaches for the TSP. Notably, we reduce the mean optimality gap on the 100-node problem set from 1.534% to 0.705%, a 2x improvement. When generalizing from 20-node instances to the 100-node problem set, we reduce the optimality gap from 18.845% to 2.622%, a 7x improvement.

Amanda Prorok, Matthew Malencia, Luca Carlone et al.

Robustness is key to engineering, automation, and science as a whole. However, the property of robustness is often underpinned by costly requirements such as over-provisioning, known uncertainty and predictive models, and known adversaries. These conditions are idealistic, and often not satisfiable. Resilience on the other hand is the capability to endure unexpected disruptions, to recover swiftly from negative events, and bounce back to normality. In this survey article, we analyze how resilience is achieved in networks of agents and multi-robot systems that are able to overcome adversity by leveraging system-wide complementarity, diversity, and redundancy - often involving a reconfiguration of robotic capabilities to provide some key ability that was not present in the system a priori. As society increasingly depends on connected automated systems to provide key infrastructure services (e.g., logistics, transport, and precision agriculture), providing the means to achieving resilient multi-robot systems is paramount. By enumerating the consequences of a system that is not resilient (fragile), we argue that resilience must become a central engineering design consideration. Towards this goal, the community needs to gain clarity on how it is defined, measured, and maintained. We address these questions across foundational robotics domains, spanning perception, control, planning, and learning. One of our key contributions is a formal taxonomy of approaches, which also helps us discuss the defining factors and stressors for a resilient system. Finally, this survey article gives insight as to how resilience may be achieved. Importantly, we highlight open problems that remain to be tackled in order to reap the benefits of resilient robotic systems.

Alex Raymond, Matthew Malencia, Guilherme Paulino-Passos et al.

Fairness is commonly seen as a property of the global outcome of a system and assumes centralisation and complete knowledge. However, in real decentralised applications, agents only have partial observation capabilities. Under limited information, agents rely on communication to divulge some of their private (and unobservable) information to others. When an agent deliberates to resolve conflicts, limited knowledge may cause its perspective of a correct outcome to differ from the actual outcome of the conflict resolution. This is subjective unfairness. To enable decentralised, fairness-aware conflict resolution under privacy constraints, we have two contributions: (1) a novel interaction approach and (2) a formalism of the relationship between privacy and fairness. Our proposed interaction approach is an architecture for privacy-aware explainable conflict resolution where agents engage in a dialogue of hypotheses and facts. To measure the privacy-fairness relationship, we define subjective and objective fairness on both the local and global scope and formalise the impact of partial observability due to privacy in these different notions of fairness. We first study our proposed architecture and the privacy-fairness relationship in the abstract, testing different argumentation strategies on a large number of randomised cultures. We empirically demonstrate the trade-off between privacy, objective fairness, and subjective fairness and show that better strategies can mitigate the effects of privacy in distributed systems. In addition to this analysis across a broad set of randomised abstract cultures, we analyse a case study for a specific scenario: we instantiate our architecture in a multi-agent simulation of prioritised rule-aware collision avoidance with limited information disclosure.

Matthew Malencia, Vijay Kumar, George Pappas et al.

We study the consideration of fairness in redundant assignment for multi-agent task allocation. It has recently been shown that redundant assignment of agents to tasks provides robustness to uncertainty in task performance. However, the question of how to fairly assign these redundant resources across tasks remains unaddressed. In this paper, we present a novel problem formulation for fair redundant task allocation, which we cast as the optimization of worst-case task costs under a cardinality constraint. Solving this problem optimally is NP-hard. We exploit properties of supermodularity to propose a polynomial-time, near-optimal solution. In supermodular redundant assignment, the use of additional agents always improves task costs. Therefore, we provide a solution set that is $α$ times larger than the cardinality constraint. This constraint relaxation enables our approach to achieve a super-optimal cost by using a sub-optimal assignment size. We derive the sub-optimality bound on this cardinality relaxation, $α$. Additionally, we demonstrate that our algorithm performs near-optimally without the cardinality relaxation. We show simulations of redundant assignments of robots to goal nodes on transport networks with uncertain travel times. Empirically, our algorithm outperforms benchmarks, scales to large problems, and provides improvements in both fairness and average utility.

Yiannis Kantaros, Matthew Malencia, George J. Pappas

This paper proposes a new reactive temporal logic planning algorithm for multiple robots that operate in environments with unknown geometry modeled using occupancy grid maps. The robots are equipped with individual sensors that allow them to continuously learn a grid map of the unknown environment using existing Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) methods. The goal of the robots is to accomplish complex collaborative tasks, captured by global Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulas. The majority of existing LTL planning approaches rely on discrete abstractions of the robot dynamics operating in known environments and, as a result, they cannot be applied to the more realistic scenarios where the environment is initially unknown. In this paper, we address this novel challenge by proposing the first reactive, abstraction-free, and distributed LTL planning algorithm that can be applied for complex mission planning of multiple robots operating in unknown environments. The proposed algorithm is reactive, i.e., planning is adapting to the updated environmental map and abstraction-free as it does not rely on designing abstractions of the robot dynamics. Also, our algorithm is distributed in the sense that the global LTL task is decomposed into single-agent reachability problems constructed online based on the continuously learned map. The proposed algorithm is complete under mild assumptions on the structure of the environment and the sensor models. We provide extensive numerical simulations and hardware experiments that illustrate the theoretical analysis and show that the proposed algorithm can address complex planning tasks for large-scale multi-robot systems in unknown environments.