Antonio Andriella

Tamlin Love, Antonio Andriella, Guillem Alenyà

Explainability, in particular, the ability for robots to explain why they have made a decision or behaved in a certain way, is a critical tool in helping users understand the robots they interact and coexist with. Behaviour trees are a popular framework for controlling the decision-making of robots, and thus a natural question to ask is whether or not a system driven by a behaviour tree is capable of answering "why" questions. While explainability for behaviour tree-driven robots has seen some prior attention, no existing methods are capable of generating causal, counterfactual explanations which detail the reasons for robot decisions and behaviour. Therefore, in this work, we introduce a novel approach which automatically generates counterfactual explanations in response to contrastive "why" questions. Our method achieves this by first automatically building a causal model from the structure of the behaviour tree as well as domain knowledge about the state and individual behaviour tree nodes. The resultant causal model is then queried and searched to find a set of diverse counterfactual explanations. We demonstrate that our approach is able to correctly explain the behaviour of a wide range of behaviour tree structures and states in real time, unlike previous methods which are either unable to answer contrastive questions with causal explanations, or are not guaranteed to provide consistent and accurate explanations. By being able to answer a wide range of causal queries, our approach represents a step towards more transparent, understandable, and ultimately safe and trustworthy robotic systems.

Alessandra Rossi, Antonio Andriella, Silvia Rossi et al.

The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots. This workshop will provide a forum for representatives from academia and industry communities to analyse the different aspects of HRI that impact on its success. We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions, on the factors that enhance, undermine, or recover humans' acceptance and trust in robots, and on the potential ethical and legal concerns related to the deployment of such robots in human-centred environments. Website: https://sites.google.com/view/traits-hri-2022

Aniol Civit, Antonio Rago, Antonio Andriella et al.

Gradual argumentation is a field of symbolic AI which is attracting attention for its ability to support transparent and contestable AI systems. It is considered a useful tool in domains such as decision-making, recommendation, debate analysis, and others. The outcomes in such domains are usually dependent on the arguments' base scores, which must be selected carefully. Often, this selection process requires user expertise and may not always be straightforward. On the other hand, organising the arguments by preference could simplify the task. In this work, we introduce \emph{Base Score Extraction Functions}, which provide a mapping from users' preferences over arguments to base scores. These functions can be applied to the arguments of a \emph{Bipolar Argumentation Framework} (BAF), supplemented with preferences, to obtain a \emph{Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Framework} (QBAF), allowing the use of well-established computational tools in gradual argumentation. We outline the desirable properties of base score extraction functions, discuss some design choices, and provide an algorithm for base score extraction. Our method incorporates an approximation of non-linearities in human preferences to allow for better approximation of the real ones. Finally, we evaluate our approach both theoretically and experimentally in a robotics setting, and offer recommendations for selecting appropriate gradual semantics in practice.

Aniol Civit, Antonio Andriella, Carles Sierra et al.

While personalisation in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) has advanced significantly, most existing approaches focus on single-user adaptation, overlooking scenarios involving multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting preferences. To address this, we propose the Multi-User Preferences Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Framework (MUP-QBAF), a novel multi-user personalisation framework based on Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs) that explicitly models and resolves multi-user preference conflicts. Unlike prior work in Argumentation Frameworks, which typically assumes static inputs, our approach is tailored to robotics: it incorporates both users' arguments and the robot's dynamic observations of the environment, allowing the system to adapt over time and respond to changing contexts. Preferences, both positive and negative, are represented as arguments whose strength is recalculated iteratively based on new information. The framework's properties and capabilities are presented and validated through a realistic case study, where an assistive robot mediates between the conflicting preferences of a caregiver and a care recipient during a frailty assessment task. This evaluation further includes a sensitivity analysis of argument base scores, demonstrating how preference outcomes can be shaped by user input and contextual observations. By offering a transparent, structured, and context-sensitive approach to resolving competing user preferences, this work advances the field of multi-user HRI. It provides a principled alternative to data-driven methods, enabling robots to navigate conflicts in real-world environments.

Antonio Andriella, Giovanni Falcone, Silvia Rossi

The adaptation to users' preferences and the ability to infer and interpret humans' beliefs and intents, which is known as the Theory of Mind (ToM), are two crucial aspects for achieving effective human-robot collaboration. Despite its importance, very few studies have investigated the impact of adaptive robots with ToM abilities. In this work, we present an exploratory comparative study to investigate how social robots equipped with ToM abilities impact users' performance and perception. We design a two-layer architecture. The Q-learning agent on the first layer learns the robot's higher-level behaviour. On the second layer, a heuristic-based ToM infers the user's intended strategy and is responsible for implementing the robot's assistance, as well as providing the motivation behind its choice. We conducted a user study in a real-world setting, involving 56 participants who interacted with either an adaptive robot capable of ToM, or with a robot lacking such abilities. Our findings suggest that participants in the ToM condition performed better, accepted the robot's assistance more often, and perceived its ability to adapt, predict and recognise their intents to a higher degree. Our preliminary insights could inform future research and pave the way for designing more complex computation architectures for adaptive behaviour with ToM capabilities.

Antonio Andriella, Alessandra Rossi, Silvia Rossi et al.

The aim of this workshop is to give researchers from academia and industry the possibility to discuss the inter-and multi-disciplinary nature of the relationships between people and robots towards effective and long-lasting collaborations. This workshop will provide a forum for the HRI and robotics communities to explore successful human-robot interaction (HRI) to analyse the different aspects of HRI that impact its success. Particular focus are the AI algorithms required to implement autonomous interactions, and the factors that enhance, undermine, or recover humans' trust in robots. Finally, potential ethical and legal concerns, and how they can be addressed will be considered. Website: https://sites.google.com/view/traits-hri