Vishak Prasad C

LG
h-index2
3papers
330citations
Novelty48%
AI Score35

3 Papers

11.8LGNov 2, 2022
Speeding up NAS with Adaptive Subset Selection

Vishak Prasad C, Colin White, Paarth Jain et al.

A majority of recent developments in neural architecture search (NAS) have been aimed at decreasing the computational cost of various techniques without affecting their final performance. Towards this goal, several low-fidelity and performance prediction methods have been considered, including those that train only on subsets of the training data. In this work, we present an adaptive subset selection approach to NAS and present it as complementary to state-of-the-art NAS approaches. We uncover a natural connection between one-shot NAS algorithms and adaptive subset selection and devise an algorithm that makes use of state-of-the-art techniques from both areas. We use these techniques to substantially reduce the runtime of DARTS-PT (a leading one-shot NAS algorithm), as well as BOHB and DEHB (leading multifidelity optimization algorithms), without sacrificing accuracy. Our results are consistent across multiple datasets, and towards full reproducibility, we release our code at https: //anonymous.4open.science/r/SubsetSelection NAS-B132.

40.6LGMay 4, 2023Code
When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?

Duncan McElfresh, Sujay Khandagale, Jonathan Valverde et al.

Tabular data is one of the most commonly used types of data in machine learning. Despite recent advances in neural nets (NNs) for tabular data, there is still an active discussion on whether or not NNs generally outperform gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) on tabular data, with several recent works arguing either that GBDTs consistently outperform NNs on tabular data, or vice versa. In this work, we take a step back and question the importance of this debate. To this end, we conduct the largest tabular data analysis to date, comparing 19 algorithms across 176 datasets, and we find that the 'NN vs. GBDT' debate is overemphasized: for a surprisingly high number of datasets, either the performance difference between GBDTs and NNs is negligible, or light hyperparameter tuning on a GBDT is more important than choosing between NNs and GBDTs. A remarkable exception is the recently-proposed prior-data fitted network, TabPFN: although it is effectively limited to training sets of size 3000, we find that it outperforms all other algorithms on average, even when randomly sampling 3000 training datapoints. Next, we analyze dozens of metafeatures to determine what properties of a dataset make NNs or GBDTs better-suited to perform well. For example, we find that GBDTs are much better than NNs at handling skewed or heavy-tailed feature distributions and other forms of dataset irregularities. Our insights act as a guide for practitioners to determine which techniques may work best on their dataset. Finally, with the goal of accelerating tabular data research, we release the TabZilla Benchmark Suite: a collection of the 36 'hardest' of the datasets we study. Our benchmark suite, codebase, and all raw results are available at https://github.com/naszilla/tabzilla.

3.6CVMay 15, 2025
Enhancing Multi-Image Question Answering via Submodular Subset Selection

Aaryan Sharma, Shivansh Gupta, Samar Agarwal et al.

Large multimodal models (LMMs) have achieved high performance in vision-language tasks involving single image but they struggle when presented with a collection of multiple images (Multiple Image Question Answering scenario). These tasks, which involve reasoning over large number of images, present issues in scalability (with increasing number of images) and retrieval performance. In this work, we propose an enhancement for retriever framework introduced in MIRAGE model using submodular subset selection techniques. Our method leverages query-aware submodular functions, such as GraphCut, to pre-select a subset of semantically relevant images before main retrieval component. We demonstrate that using anchor-based queries and augmenting the data improves submodular-retriever pipeline effectiveness, particularly in large haystack sizes.