Nilanjana Laha

Rebekka Burkholz, Nilanjana Laha, Rajarshi Mukherjee et al.

The lottery ticket hypothesis conjectures the existence of sparse subnetworks of large randomly initialized deep neural networks that can be successfully trained in isolation. Recent work has experimentally observed that some of these tickets can be practically reused across a variety of tasks, hinting at some form of universality. We formalize this concept and theoretically prove that not only do such universal tickets exist but they also do not require further training. Our proofs introduce a couple of technical innovations related to pruning for strong lottery tickets, including extensions of subset sum results and a strategy to leverage higher amounts of depth. Our explicit sparse constructions of universal function families might be of independent interest, as they highlight representational benefits induced by univariate convolutional architectures.

Aaron Sonabend-W, Nilanjana Laha, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown great success in estimating sequential treatment strategies which take into account patient heterogeneity. However, health-outcome information, which is used as the reward for reinforcement learning methods, is often not well coded but rather embedded in clinical notes. Extracting precise outcome information is a resource intensive task, so most of the available well-annotated cohorts are small. To address this issue, we propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that efficiently leverages a small sized labeled data with true outcome observed, and a large unlabeled data with outcome surrogates. In particular, we propose a semi-supervised, efficient approach to Q-learning and doubly robust off policy value estimation. Generalizing SSL to sequential treatment regimes brings interesting challenges: 1) Feature distribution for Q-learning is unknown as it includes previous outcomes. 2) The surrogate variables we leverage in the modified SSL framework are predictive of the outcome but not informative to the optimal policy or value function. We provide theoretical results for our Q-function and value function estimators to understand to what degree efficiency can be gained from SSL. Our method is at least as efficient as the supervised approach, and moreover safe as it robust to mis-specification of the imputation models.