1.2GTMar 4
Capability-Priced Micro-Markets: A Micro-Economic Framework for the Agentic Web over HTTP 402Ken Huang, Jerry Huang, Mahesh Lambe et al.
This paper introduces Capability-Priced Micro-Markets (CPMM), a micro-economic framework designed to enable robust, scalable, and secure commerce among autonomous AI agents on the agentic web. The framework addresses the fundamental challenge of economic coordination in decentralized agent ecosystems, where entities must transact with minimal human oversight. CPMM synthesizes three key technologies into a unified system: MIT originated, Project NANDA infrastructure for cryptographically verifiable, capability-based security and discovery; the HTTP 402 "Payment Required" status code, with modern X402/H402 extensions for efficient, low-cost micropayments; and the Agent Capability Negotiation and Binding Protocol (ACNBP) for secure, multi-step negotiation and commitment. The paper formalizes agent interactions as a repeated bilateral game with incomplete information, demonstrating theoretically that the CPMM mechanism converges to a constrained Radner equilibrium, ensuring efficient outcomes under information asymmetry. A key theoretical contribution is the concept of "privacy elasticity of demand," which is introduced to quantify the trade-off between an agent's information disclosure and the market price of its services. By integrating secure capabilities, micropayment protocols, and formal negotiation mechanisms, CPMM provides a comprehensive, theoretically-grounded solution for creating functional micro-markets for the emergent agentic web.
11.1AIJul 21, 2025
QSAF: A Novel Mitigation Framework for Cognitive Degradation in Agentic AIHammad Atta, Muhammad Zeeshan Baig, Yasir Mehmood et al.
We introduce Cognitive Degradation as a novel vulnerability class in agentic AI systems. Unlike traditional adversarial external threats such as prompt injection, these failures originate internally, arising from memory starvation, planner recursion, context flooding, and output suppression. These systemic weaknesses lead to silent agent drift, logic collapse, and persistent hallucinations over time. To address this class of failures, we introduce the Qorvex Security AI Framework for Behavioral & Cognitive Resilience (QSAF Domain 10), a lifecycle-aware defense framework defined by a six-stage cognitive degradation lifecycle. The framework includes seven runtime controls (QSAF-BC-001 to BC-007) that monitor agent subsystems in real time and trigger proactive mitigation through fallback routing, starvation detection, and memory integrity enforcement. Drawing from cognitive neuroscience, we map agentic architectures to human analogs, enabling early detection of fatigue, starvation, and role collapse. By introducing a formal lifecycle and real-time mitigation controls, this work establishes Cognitive Degradation as a critical new class of AI system vulnerability and proposes the first cross-platform defense model for resilient agentic behavior.
8.6CRAug 4, 2025
DIRF: A Framework for Digital Identity Protection and Clone Governance in Agentic AI SystemsHammad Atta, Muhammad Zeeshan Baig, Yasir Mehmood et al.
The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) pose significant threats to the integrity of personal identity, including digital cloning, sophisticated impersonation, and the unauthorized monetization of identity-related data. Mitigating these risks necessitates the development of robust AI-generated content detection systems, enhanced legal frameworks, and ethical guidelines. This paper introduces the Digital Identity Rights Framework (DIRF), a structured security and governance model designed to protect behavioral, biometric, and personality-based digital likeness attributes to address this critical need. Structured across nine domains and 63 controls, DIRF integrates legal, technical, and hybrid enforcement mechanisms to secure digital identity consent, traceability, and monetization. We present the architectural foundations, enforcement strategies, and key use cases supporting the need for a unified framework. This work aims to inform platform builders, legal entities, and regulators about the essential controls needed to enforce identity rights in AI-driven systems.