Cristinel Mateis

Ezio Bartocci, Alessio Gambi, Felix Gigler et al.

Scenario-based testing is a key method for cost-effective and safe validation of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Existing approaches rely on imperative scenario definitions, requiring developers to manually enumerate numerous variants to achieve coverage. Declarative languages, such as OpenSCENARIO DSL (OS2), raise the abstraction level but lack systematic methods for instantiating concrete, specification-compliant scenarios as simulations. To our knowledge, currently, no open-source solution provides this capability. We present RoadLogic that bridges declarative OS2 specifications and executable simulations. It uses Answer Set Programming to generate abstract plans satisfying scenario constraints, motion planning to refine the plans into feasible trajectories, and specification-based monitoring to verify correctness. We evaluate RoadLogic on instantiating representative OS2 scenarios as simulations in the CommonRoad framework. Results show that RoadLogic consistently produces realistic, specification-satisfying simulations within minutes and captures diverse behavioral variants through parameter sampling, thus opening the door to systematic scenario-based testing for autonomous driving systems.

Elias Horner, Cristinel Mateis, Guido Governatori et al.

We present a novel approach to the automated semantic analysis of legal texts using large language models (LLMs), targeting their transformation into formal representations in Defeasible Deontic Logic (DDL). We propose a structured pipeline that segments complex normative language into atomic snippets, extracts deontic rules, and evaluates them for syntactic and semantic coherence. Our methodology is evaluated across various LLM configurations, including prompt engineering strategies, fine-tuned models, and multi-stage pipelines, focusing on legal norms from the Australian Telecommunications Consumer Protections Code. Empirical results demonstrate promising alignment between machine-generated and expert-crafted formalizations, showing that LLMs - particularly when prompted effectively - can significantly contribute to scalable legal informatics.

Ezio Bartocci, Jyotirmoy Deshmukh, Cristinel Mateis et al.

We present ShapeIt, a tool for mining specifications of cyber-physical systems (CPS) from their real-valued behaviors. The learned specifications are in the form of linear shape expressions, a declarative formal specification language suitable to express behavioral properties over real-valued signals. A linear shape expression is a regular expression composed of parameterized lines as atomic symbols with symbolic constraints on the line parameters. We present here the architecture of our tool along with the different steps of the specification mining algorithm. We also describe the usage of the tool demonstrating its applicability on several case studies from different application domains.

Ezio Bartocci, Niveditha Manjunath, Leonardo Mariani et al.

Debugging Cyber-Physical System (CPS) models can be extremely complex. Indeed, only the detection of a failure is insuffcient to know how to correct a faulty model. Faults can propagate in time and in space producing observable misbehaviours in locations completely different from the location of the fault. Understanding the reason of an observed failure is typically a challenging and laborious task left to the experience and domain knowledge of the designer. \n In this paper, we propose CPSDebug, a novel approach that by combining testing, specification mining, and failure analysis, can automatically explain failures in Simulink/Stateflow models. We evaluate CPSDebug on two case studies, involving two use scenarios and several classes of faults, demonstrating the potential value of our approach.