Pavel Chebotarev

LG
h-index20
8papers
47citations
Novelty31%
AI Score21

8 Papers

5.1MAJan 15, 2013
The forest consensus theorem

Pavel Chebotarev, Rafig Agaev

We show that the limiting state vector in the differential model of consensus seeking with an arbitrary communication digraph is obtained by multiplying the eigenprojection of the Laplacian matrix of the model by the vector of initial states. Furthermore, the eigenprojection coincides with the stochastic matrix of maximum out-forests of the weighted communication digraph. These statements make the forests consensus theorem. A similar result for DeGroot's iterative pooling model requires the Cesaro (time-average) limit in the general case. The forests consensus theorem is useful for the analysis of consensus protocols.

2.4OCNov 23, 2018
Two Models of Latent Consensus in Multi-Agent Systems

Rafig Agaev, Pavel Chebotarev

In this paper, we propose several consensus protocols of the first and second order for networked multi-agent systems and provide explicit representations for their asymptotic states. These representations involve the eigenprojection of the Laplacian matrix of the dependency digraph. In particular, we study regularization models for the problem of coordination when the dependency digraph does not contain a converging tree. In such models of the first kind, the system is supplemented by a dummy agent, a "hub" that uniformly, but very weakly influences the agents and, in turn, depends on them. In the models of the second kind, we assume the presence of very weak background links between the agents. Besides that, we present a description of the asymptotics of the classical second-order consensus protocol.

1.2SIFeb 20, 2022Code
Dissecting graph measure performance for node clustering in LFR parameter space

Vladimir Ivashkin, Pavel Chebotarev

Graph measures that express closeness or distance between nodes can be employed for graph nodes clustering using metric clustering algorithms. There are numerous measures applicable to this task, and which one performs better is an open question. We study the performance of 25 graph measures on generated graphs with different parameters. While usually measure comparisons are limited to general measure ranking on a particular dataset, we aim to explore the performance of various measures depending on graph features. Using an LFR graph generator, we create a dataset of 11780 graphs covering the whole LFR parameter space. For each graph, we assess the quality of clustering with k-means algorithm for each considered measure. Based on this, we determine the best measure for each area of the parameter space. We find that the parameter space consists of distinct zones where one particular measure is the best. We analyze the geometry of the resulting zones and describe it with simple criteria. Given particular graph parameters, this allows us to recommend a particular measure to use for clustering.

1.2SINov 4, 2021
Measuring Proximity in Attributed Networks for Community Detection

Rinat Aynulin, Pavel Chebotarev

Proximity measures on graphs have a variety of applications in network analysis, including community detection. Previously they have been mainly studied in the context of networks without attributes. If node attributes are taken into account, however, this can provide more insight into the network structure. In this paper, we extend the definition of some well-studied proximity measures to attributed networks. To account for attributes, several attribute similarity measures are used. Finally, the obtained proximity measures are applied to detect the community structure in some real-world networks using the spectral clustering algorithm.

1.2SOC-PHMar 2, 2020Code
How to choose the most appropriate centrality measure? A decision tree approach

Pavel Chebotarev, Dmitry Gubanov

Centrality metrics play a crucial role in network analysis, while the choice of specific measures significantly influences the accuracy of conclusions as each measure represents a unique concept of node importance. Among over 400 proposed indices, selecting the most suitable ones for specific applications remains a challenge. Existing approaches -- model-based, data-driven, and axiomatic -- have limitations, requiring association with models, training datasets, or restrictive axioms for each specific application. To address this, we introduce the culling method, which relies on the expert concept of centrality behavior on simple graphs. The culling method involves forming a set of candidate measures, generating a list of as small graphs as possible needed to distinguish the measures from each other, constructing a decision-tree survey, and identifying the measure consistent with the expert's concept. We apply this approach to a diverse set of 40 centralities, including novel kernel-based indices, and combine it with the axiomatic approach. Remarkably, only 13 small 1-trees are sufficient to separate all 40 measures, even for pairs of closely related ones. By adopting simple ordinal axioms like Self-consistency or Bridge axiom, the set of measures can be drastically reduced making the culling survey short. Applying the culling method provides insightful findings on some centrality indices, such as PageRank, Bridging, and dissimilarity-based Eigencentrality measures, among others. The proposed approach offers a cost-effective solution in terms of labor and time, complementing existing methods for measure selection, and providing deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms of centrality measures.

4.3LGMay 3, 2016
Do logarithmic proximity measures outperform plain ones in graph clustering?

Vladimir Ivashkin, Pavel Chebotarev

We consider a number of graph kernels and proximity measures including commute time kernel, regularized Laplacian kernel, heat kernel, exponential diffusion kernel (also called "communicability"), etc., and the corresponding distances as applied to clustering nodes in random graphs and several well-known datasets. The model of generating random graphs involves edge probabilities for the pairs of nodes that belong to the same class or different predefined classes of nodes. It turns out that in most cases, logarithmic measures (i.e., measures resulting after taking logarithm of the proximities) perform better while distinguishing underlying classes than the "plain" measures. A comparison in terms of reject curves of inter-class and intra-class distances confirms this conclusion. A similar conclusion can be made for several well-known datasets. A possible origin of this effect is that most kernels have a multiplicative nature, while the nature of distances used in cluster algorithms is an additive one (cf. the triangle inequality). The logarithmic transformation is a tool to transform the first nature to the second one. Moreover, some distances corresponding to the logarithmic measures possess a meaningful cutpoint additivity property. In our experiments, the leader is usually the logarithmic Communicability measure. However, we indicate some more complicated cases in which other measures, typically, Communicability and plain Walk, can be the winners.

3.9LGAug 20, 2015
Semi-supervised Learning with Regularized Laplacian

Konstantin Avrachenkov, Pavel Chebotarev, Alexey Mishenin

We study a semi-supervised learning method based on the similarity graph and RegularizedLaplacian. We give convenient optimization formulation of the Regularized Laplacian method and establishits various properties. In particular, we show that the kernel of the methodcan be interpreted in terms of discrete and continuous time random walks and possesses several importantproperties of proximity measures. Both optimization and linear algebra methods can be used for efficientcomputation of the classification functions. We demonstrate on numerical examples that theRegularized Laplacian method is competitive with respect to the other state of the art semi-supervisedlearning methods.

1.2COMay 28, 2013
Matrices of forests, analysis of networks, and ranking problems

Pavel Chebotarev, Rafig Agaev

The matrices of spanning rooted forests are studied as a tool for analysing the structure of networks and measuring their properties. The problems of revealing the basic bicomponents, measuring vertex proximity, and ranking from preference relations / sports competitions are considered. It is shown that the vertex accessibility measure based on spanning forests has a number of desirable properties. An interpretation for the stochastic matrix of out-forests in terms of information dissemination is given.