Linda Kleist

Håvard Bakke Bjerkevik, Joseph Dorfer, Linda Kleist et al.

We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam$(F(P))$ for sets $P$ of $n$ points in convex position. The current best bounds are $\frac{14}{9}n-O(1) \leq$ diam$(F(P))<\frac{15}{9}n-3$ [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25], we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is *stacked*. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$ to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph $F(P)$ for $n$ points in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n-o(n)$.

Tim Gerlach, Benjamin Hennies, Linda Kleist

While rectangular and box-shaped objects dominate the classic discourse of theoretic investigations, a fascinating frontier lies in packing more complex shapes. Given recent insights that convex polygons do not allow for constant competitive online algorithms for diverse variants under translation, we study orthogonal polygons, in particular of small complexity. For translational packings of orthogonal 6-gons, we show that the competitive ratio of any online algorithm that aims to pack the items into a minimal number of unit bins is in $Ω(n / \log n)$, where $n$ denotes the number of objects. In contrast, we show that constant competitive algorithms exist when the orthogonal 6-gons are symmetric or small. For (orthogonally convex) orthogonal 8-gons, we show that the trivial $n$-competitive algorithm, which places each item in its own bin, is best-possible, i.e., every online algorithm has an asymptotic competitive ratio of at least $n$. This implies that for general orthogonal polygons, the trivial algorithm is best possible. Interestingly, for packing degenerate orthogonal polygons (with thickness $0$), called skeletons, the change in complexity is even more drastic. While constant competitive algorithms for 6-skeletons exist, no online algorithm for 8-skeletons achieves a competitive ratio better than $n$. For other packing variants of orthogonal 6-gons under translation, our insights imply the following consequences. The asymptotic competitive ratio of any online algorithm is in $Ω(n / \log n)$ for strip packing, and there exist online algorithms with competitive ratios in $O(1)$ for perimeter packing, or in $O(\sqrt{n})$ for minimizing the area of the bounding box. Moreover, the critical packing density is positive (if every object individually fits into the interior of a unit bin).

Katrin Casel, Sándor Kisfaludi-Bak, Linda Kleist et al.

We study the problem of computing a shortest tour that visits a sequence of $k$ polygons $P_1,\dots, P_k$ with a total number of $n$ vertices. A tour is an oriented curve such that there exist points $p_i\in P_i$ for all $i$ where $p_i$ appears not after $p_{i+1}$. In a seminal paper Dror, Efrat, Lubiw, and Mitchell (STOC 2003) considered the problem under $L_2$ distance, and gave $\widetilde O(nk)$ and $\widetilde O(nk^2)$ algorithms for disjoint and intersecting convex polygons, respectively. This paper considers the orthogonal setting, where the input polygons have axis-aligned edges and the distance metric is the Manhattan distance. We obtain the following results: - as our main contribution, a truly subquadratic $\widetilde O(n^{2-\frac{1}{48}})$ algorithm when consecutive polygons in the sequence are disjoint; - an $\widetilde O(n)$ algorithm for ortho-convex polygons when consecutive polygons are disjoint; - an $O(n)$ algorithm for axis-aligned rectangles; - $\widetilde O(n^2)$ and $\widetilde O(n^{1.5}k^2)$ algorithms without restrictions. Our algorithms build on a wide range of techniques, including additively weighted Voronoi diagrams, rectangle decompositions, persistent data structures, and dynamic distance oracles for weighted planar graphs.

Anders Aamand, Mikkel Abrahamsen, Reilly Browne et al.

We study the problems of covering or partitioning a polygon $P$ (possibly with holes) using a minimum number of small pieces, where a small piece is a connected sub-polygon contained in an axis-aligned unit square. For covering, we seek to write $P$ as a union of small pieces, and in partitioning, we furthermore require the pieces to be pairwise interior-disjoint. We show that these problems are in fact equivalent: Optimum covers and partitions have the same number of pieces. For covering, a natural local search algorithm repeatedly attempts to replace $k$ pieces from a candidate cover with $k-1$ pieces. In two dimensions and for sufficiently large $k$, we show that when no such swap is possible, the cover is a $1+O(1/\sqrt k)$-approximation, hence obtaining the first PTAS for the problem. Prior to our work, the only known algorithm was a $13$-approximation that only works for polygons without holes [Abrahamsen and Rasmussen, SODA 2025]. In contrast, in the three dimensional version of the problem, for a polyhedron $P$ of complexity $n$, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate an optimal cover or partition to within a factor that is logarithmic in $n$, even if $P$ is simple, i.e., has genus $0$ and no holes.

Mikkel Abrahamsen, Linda Kleist, Tillmann Miltzow

Given a neural network, training data, and a threshold, it was known that it is NP-hard to find weights for the neural network such that the total error is below the threshold. We determine the algorithmic complexity of this fundamental problem precisely, by showing that it is $\exists\mathbb R$-complete. This means that the problem is equivalent, up to polynomial-time reductions, to deciding whether a system of polynomial equations and inequalities with integer coefficients and real unknowns has a solution. If, as widely expected, $\exists\mathbb R$ is strictly larger than NP, our work implies that the problem of training neural networks is not even in NP. Neural networks are usually trained using some variation of backpropagation. The result of this paper offers an explanation why techniques commonly used to solve big instances of NP-complete problems seem not to be of use for this task. Examples of such techniques are SAT solvers, IP solvers, local search, dynamic programming, to name a few general ones.