Nian-Jhen Lin

Fu-Shun Hsu, Shang-Ran Huang, Chang-Fu Su et al.

Many deep learning-based computerized respiratory sound analysis methods have previously been developed. However, these studies focus on either lung sound only or tracheal sound only. The effectiveness of using a lung sound analysis algorithm on tracheal sound and vice versa has never been investigated. Furthermore, no one knows whether using lung and tracheal sounds together in training a respiratory sound analysis model is beneficial. In this study, we first constructed a tracheal sound database, HF_Tracheal_V1, containing 10448 15-s tracheal sound recordings, 21741 inhalation labels, 15858 exhalation labels, and 6414 continuous adventitious sound (CAS) labels. HF_Tracheal_V1 and our previously built lung sound database, HF_Lung_V2, were either combined (mixed set), used one after the other (domain adaptation), or used alone to train convolutional neural network bidirectional gate recurrent unit models for inhalation, exhalation, and CAS detection in lung and tracheal sounds. The results revealed that the models trained using lung sound alone performed poorly in tracheal sound analysis and vice versa. However, mixed set training or domain adaptation improved the performance for 1) inhalation and exhalation detection in lung sounds and 2) inhalation, exhalation, and CAS detection in tracheal sounds compared to positive controls (the models trained using lung sound alone and used in lung sound analysis and vice versa). In particular, the model trained on the mixed set had great flexibility to serve two purposes, lung and tracheal sound analyses, at the same time.

Fu-Shun Hsu, Shang-Ran Huang, Chien-Wen Huang et al.

A reliable, remote, and continuous real-time respiratory sound monitor with automated respiratory sound analysis ability is urgently required in many clinical scenarios-such as in monitoring disease progression of coronavirus disease 2019-to replace conventional auscultation with a handheld stethoscope. However, a robust computerized respiratory sound analysis algorithm has not yet been validated in practical applications. In this study, we developed a lung sound database (HF_Lung_V1) comprising 9,765 audio files of lung sounds (duration of 15 s each), 34,095 inhalation labels, 18,349 exhalation labels, 13,883 continuous adventitious sound (CAS) labels (comprising 8,457 wheeze labels, 686 stridor labels, and 4,740 rhonchi labels), and 15,606 discontinuous adventitious sound labels (all crackles). We conducted benchmark tests for long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), bidirectional GRU (BiGRU), convolutional neural network (CNN)-LSTM, CNN-GRU, CNN-BiLSTM, and CNN-BiGRU models for breath phase detection and adventitious sound detection. We also conducted a performance comparison between the LSTM-based and GRU-based models, between unidirectional and bidirectional models, and between models with and without a CNN. The results revealed that these models exhibited adequate performance in lung sound analysis. The GRU-based models outperformed, in terms of F1 scores and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, the LSTM-based models in most of the defined tasks. Furthermore, all bidirectional models outperformed their unidirectional counterparts. Finally, the addition of a CNN improved the accuracy of lung sound analysis, especially in the CAS detection tasks.