Anne C. Elster

Lars Bjertnes, Jacob O. Tørring, Anne C. Elster

The effectiveness of Machine Learning (ML) methods depend on access to large suitable datasets. In this article, we present how we build the LS-CAT (Large-Scale CUDA AutoTuning) dataset sourced from GitHub for the purpose of training NLP-based ML models. Our dataset includes 19 683 CUDA kernels focused on linear algebra. In addition to the CUDA codes, our LS-CAT dataset contains 5 028 536 associated runtimes, with different combinations of kernels, block sizes and matrix sizes. The runtime are GPU benchmarks on both Nvidia GTX 980 and Nvidia T4 systems. This information creates a foundation upon which NLP-based models can find correlations between source-code features and optimal choice of thread block sizes. There are several results that can be drawn out of our LS-CAT database. E.g., our experimental results show that an optimal choice in thread block size can gain an average of 6% for the average case. We thus also analyze how much performance increase can be achieved in general, finding that in 10% of the cases more than 20% performance increase can be achieved by using the optimal block. A description of current and future work is also included.

Daniel S. Katz, Sou-Cheng T. Choi, Hilmar Lapp et al.

Challenges related to development, deployment, and maintenance of reusable software for science are becoming a growing concern. Many scientists' research increasingly depends on the quality and availability of software upon which their works are built. To highlight some of these issues and share experiences, the First Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE1) was held in November 2013 in conjunction with the SC13 Conference. The workshop featured keynote presentations and a large number (54) of solicited extended abstracts that were grouped into three themes and presented via panels. A set of collaborative notes of the presentations and discussion was taken during the workshop. Unique perspectives were captured about issues such as comprehensive documentation, development and deployment practices, software licenses and career paths for developers. Attribution systems that account for evidence of software contribution and impact were also discussed. These include mechanisms such as Digital Object Identifiers, publication of "software papers", and the use of online systems, for example source code repositories like GitHub. This paper summarizes the issues and shared experiences that were discussed, including cross-cutting issues and use cases. It joins a nascent literature seeking to understand what drives software work in science, and how it is impacted by the reward systems of science. These incentives can determine the extent to which developers are motivated to build software for the long-term, for the use of others, and whether to work collaboratively or separately. It also explores community building, leadership, and dynamics in relation to successful scientific software.