Juniper Lovato

Juniper Lovato, Philip Mueller, Parisa Suchdev et al.

Collecting personally identifiable information (PII) on data subjects has become big business. Data brokers and data processors are part of a multi-billion-dollar industry that profits from collecting, buying, and selling consumer data. Yet there is little transparency in the data collection industry which makes it difficult to understand what types of data are being collected, used, and sold, and thus the risk to individual data subjects. In this study, we examine a large textual dataset of privacy policies from 1997-2019 in order to investigate the data collection activities of data brokers and data processors. We also develop an original lexicon of PII-related terms representing PII data types curated from legislative texts. This mesoscale analysis looks at privacy policies overtime on the word, topic, and network levels to understand the stability, complexity, and sensitivity of privacy policies over time. We find that (1) privacy legislation correlates with changes in stability and turbulence of PII data types in privacy policies; (2) the complexity of privacy policies decreases over time and becomes more regularized; (3) sensitivity rises over time and shows spikes that are correlated with events when new privacy legislation is introduced.

Mohsen Ghasemizade, Juniper Lovato, Christopher M. Danforth et al.

Sharing health and behavioral data raises significant privacy concerns, as conventional de-identification methods are susceptible to privacy attacks. Differential Privacy (DP) provides formal guarantees against re-identification risks, but practical implementation necessitates balancing privacy protection and the utility of data. We demonstrate the use of DP to protect individuals in a real behavioral health study, while making the data publicly available and retaining high utility for downstream users of the data. We use the Adaptive Iterative Mechanism (AIM) to generate DP synthetic data for Phase 1 of the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS). The LEMURS dataset comprises physiological measurements from wearable devices (Oura rings) and self-reported survey data from first-year college students. We evaluate the synthetic datasets across a range of privacy budgets, epsilon = 1 to 100, focusing on the trade-off between privacy and utility. We evaluate the utility of the synthetic data using a framework informed by actual uses of the LEMURS dataset. Our evaluation identifies the trade-off between privacy and utility across synthetic datasets generated with different privacy budgets. We find that synthetic data sets with epsilon = 5 preserve adequate predictive utility while significantly mitigating privacy risks. Our methodology establishes a reproducible framework for evaluating the practical impacts of epsilon on generating private synthetic datasets with numerous attributes and records, contributing to informed decision-making in data sharing practices.