Riccardo Rubei

Juri Di Rocco, Davide Di Ruscio, Claudio Di Sipio et al.

To perform their daily tasks, developers intensively make use of existing resources by consulting open-source software (OSS) repositories. Such platforms contain rich data sources, e.g., code snippets, documentation, and user discussions, that can be useful for supporting development activities. Over the last decades, several techniques and tools have been promoted to provide developers with innovative features, aiming to bring in improvements in terms of development effort, cost savings, and productivity. In the context of the EU H2020 CROSSMINER project, a set of recommendation systems has been conceived to assist software programmers in different phases of the development process. The systems provide developers with various artifacts, such as third-party libraries, documentation about how to use the APIs being adopted, or relevant API function calls. To develop such recommendations, various technical choices have been made to overcome issues related to several aspects including the lack of baselines, limited data availability, decisions about the performance measures, and evaluation approaches. This paper is an experience report to present the knowledge pertinent to the set of recommendation systems developed through the CROSSMINER project. We explain in detail the challenges we had to deal with, together with the related lessons learned when developing and evaluating these systems. Our aim is to provide the research community with concrete takeaway messages that are expected to be useful for those who want to develop or customize their own recommendation systems. The reported experiences can facilitate interesting discussions and research work, which in the end contribute to the advancement of recommendation systems applied to solve different issues in Software Engineering.

Pernilla Hall, Anton Ununger, Riccardo Rubei et al.

Software quality assurance remains a major challenge in industrial environments, where large-scale and long-lived systems inevitably accumulate defects. Identifying the location of a fault is often time-consuming and costly, particularly during maintenance phases when developers must rely primarily on textual bug reports rather than complete runtime or code-level context. In this study, we investigated if artificial intelligence can support fault localization using only the natural-language content of bug reports. By relying only on textual information, our approach requires no access to source code, execution traces, or static analysis artifacts, making it directly deployable within existing industrial maintenance workflows. We framed fault localization as a supervised text classification problem and evaluated three traditional machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest) and two fine-tuned transformer-based language models (RoBERTa-Base and Distil-RoBERTa). Our evaluation used proprietary data from ABB Robotics in Sweden, comprising five years of resolved industrial bug reports, each linked to its verified code fix. This setting allowed us to assess model effectiveness under realistic industrial constraints. Our results showed that traditional models using term frequency-inverse document features consistently outperformed the fine-tuned language models on this dataset, while data augmentation improved Random Forest performance. These findings challenge the assumption that transformer-based models universally outperform classical approaches in industrial contexts with domain-specific data. We demonstrated that historical bug reports can be systematically used for text-based, artificial intelligence-assisted fault localization, providing a scalable, low-cost, and empirically grounded complement to common debugging practices in industry.

Riccardo Rubei, Davide Di Ruscio, Claudio Di Sipio et al.

During the development of a software project, developers often need to upgrade third-party libraries (TPLs), aiming to keep their code up-to-date with the newest functionalities offered by the used libraries. In most cases, upgrading used TPLs is a complex and error-prone activity that must be carefully carried out to limit the ripple effects on the software project that depends on the libraries being upgraded. In this paper, we propose EvoPlan as a novel approach to the recommendation of different upgrade plans given a pair of library-version as input. In particular, among the different paths that can be possibly followed to upgrade the current library version to the desired updated one, EvoPlan is able to suggest the plan that can potentially minimize the efforts being needed to migrate the code of the clients from the library's current release to the target one. The approach has been evaluated on a curated dataset using conventional metrics used in Information Retrieval, i.e., precision, recall, and F-measure. The experimental results show that EvoPlan obtains an encouraging prediction performance considering two different criteria in the plan specification, i.e., the popularity of migration paths and the number of open and closed issues in GitHub for those projects that have already followed the recommended migration paths.