Douglas Tweed

Mohamed Akrout, Douglas Tweed

Why does the Adam optimizer work so well in deep-learning applications? Adam's originators, Kingma and Ba, presented a mathematical argument that was meant to help explain its success, but Bock and colleagues have since reported that a key piece is missing from that argument $-$ an unproven lemma which we will call Bock's conjecture. Here we show that this conjecture is false, but we prove a modified version of it $-$ a generalization of a result of Reddi and colleagues $-$ which can take its place in analyses of Adam.

Mohamed Akrout, Collin Wilson, Peter C. Humphreys et al.

Current algorithms for deep learning probably cannot run in the brain because they rely on weight transport, where forward-path neurons transmit their synaptic weights to a feedback path, in a way that is likely impossible biologically. An algorithm called feedback alignment achieves deep learning without weight transport by using random feedback weights, but it performs poorly on hard visual-recognition tasks. Here we describe two mechanisms - a neural circuit called a weight mirror and a modification of an algorithm proposed by Kolen and Pollack in 1994 - both of which let the feedback path learn appropriate synaptic weights quickly and accurately even in large networks, without weight transport or complex wiring.Tested on the ImageNet visual-recognition task, these mechanisms outperform both feedback alignment and the newer sign-symmetry method, and nearly match backprop, the standard algorithm of deep learning, which uses weight transport.

Bita Behrouzi, Xuefei Liu, Douglas Tweed

Many recent algorithms for reinforcement learning are model-free and founded on the Bellman equation. Here we present a method founded on the costate equation and models of the state dynamics. We use the costate -- the gradient of cost with respect to state -- to improve the policy and also to "focus" the model, training it to detect and mimic those features of the environment that are most relevant to its task. We show that this method can handle difficult time-optimal control problems, driving deterministic or stochastic mechanical systems quickly to a target. On these tasks it works well compared to deep deterministic policy gradient, a recent Bellman method. And because it creates a model, the costate method can also learn from mental practice.

Timothy P. Lillicrap, Daniel Cownden, Douglas B. Tweed et al.

The brain processes information through many layers of neurons. This deep architecture is representationally powerful, but it complicates learning by making it hard to identify the responsible neurons when a mistake is made. In machine learning, the backpropagation algorithm assigns blame to a neuron by computing exactly how it contributed to an error. To do this, it multiplies error signals by matrices consisting of all the synaptic weights on the neuron's axon and farther downstream. This operation requires a precisely choreographed transport of synaptic weight information, which is thought to be impossible in the brain. Here we present a surprisingly simple algorithm for deep learning, which assigns blame by multiplying error signals by random synaptic weights. We show that a network can learn to extract useful information from signals sent through these random feedback connections. In essence, the network learns to learn. We demonstrate that this new mechanism performs as quickly and accurately as backpropagation on a variety of problems and describe the principles which underlie its function. Our demonstration provides a plausible basis for how a neuron can be adapted using error signals generated at distal locations in the brain, and thus dispels long-held assumptions about the algorithmic constraints on learning in neural circuits.