Vladimir Tomov

2papers

2 Papers

NAJul 25, 2018Code
The Target-Matrix Optimization Paradigm for High-Order Meshes

Veselin Dobrev, Patrick Knupp, Tzanio Kolev et al.

We describe a framework for controlling and improving the quality of high-order finite element meshes based on extensions of the Target-Matrix Optimization Paradigm (TMOP) of Knupp. This approach allows high-order applications to have a very precise control over local mesh quality, while still improving the mesh globally. We address the adaption of various TMOP components to the settings of general isoparametric element mappings, including the mesh quality metric in 2D and 3D, the selection of sample points and the solution of the resulting mesh optimization problem. We also investigate additional practical concerns, such as tangential relaxation and restricting the deviation from the original mesh. The benefits of the new high-order TMOP algorithms are illustrated on a number of test problems and examples from a high-order arbitrary Eulerian-Lagrangian (ALE) application. Our implementation is freely available in an open-source library form.

LGMar 1, 2021
Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Jiachen Yang, Tarik Dzanic, Brenden Petersen et al.

Large-scale finite element simulations of complex physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDE) crucially depend on adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) to allocate computational budget to regions where higher resolution is required. Existing scalable AMR methods make heuristic refinement decisions based on instantaneous error estimation and thus do not aim for long-term optimality over an entire simulation. We propose a novel formulation of AMR as a Markov decision process and apply deep reinforcement learning (RL) to train refinement policies directly from simulation. AMR poses a new problem for RL as both the state dimension and available action set changes at every step, which we solve by proposing new policy architectures with differing generality and inductive bias. The model sizes of these policy architectures are independent of the mesh size and hence can be deployed on larger simulations than those used at train time. We demonstrate in comprehensive experiments on static function estimation and time-dependent equations that RL policies can be trained on problems without using ground truth solutions, are competitive with a widely-used error estimator, and generalize to larger, more complex, and unseen test problems.