Asrin Efe Yorulmaz

Junji Yan, Asrin Efe Yorulmaz, Hanchen Zhou et al.

Modern Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)-backed services must satisfy strict latency service-level objectives (SLOs) while controlling spare-capacity cost. In multi-tenant GPU cloud platforms, this trade-off is inherently dynamic because workload demand is endogenous; specifically, pricing shapes the submissions of heterogeneous tenants, which subsequently impact congestion and delay. We formulate the joint pricing-and-scaling problem as a large-population Stackelberg game problem, and we derive an explicit equilibrium demand map. The resulting closed-loop model reveals a structural failure mode in which delay-insensitive workloads sustain a residual demand floor, making the backlog undrainable under bounded price and service capacity. This observation motivates a computable drainability guardrail that certifies uniformly negative drift in the residual-demand regime. For any fixed price-capacity pair satisfying the drainability guardrail, we establish a unique operating point and global convergence towards it under a checkable step-size condition. Building on this fixed-pair analysis, we further develop an optimizer-agnostic action shield for the full dynamic problem and show empirically that it improves safety and robustness for model-free reinforcement learning (RL) in this setting.

Ata Poyraz Turna, Asrin Efe Yorulmaz, Tamer Başar

Classical Bayesian persuasion studies how a sender influences receivers through carefully designed signaling policies within a single strategic interaction. In many real-world environments, such interactions are repeated across multiple games, creating opportunities to exploit structural similarity across tasks. In this work, we introduce Meta-Persuasion algorithms, establishing the first line of theoretical results for both full-feedback and bandit-feedback settings in the Online Bayesian Persuasion (OBP) and Markov Persuasion Process (MPP) frameworks. We show that our proposed meta-persuasion algorithms achieve provably sharper regret rates under natural notions of task similarity, improving upon the best-known convergence rates for both OBP and MPP. At the same time, they recover the standard single-game guarantees when the sequence of games is picked arbitrarily. Finally, we complement our theoretical analysis with numerical experiments that highlight our regret improvements and the benefits of meta-learning in repeated persuasion environments.

Asrin Efe Yorulmaz, Tamer Başar

No-regret learning dynamics play a central role in game theory, enabling decentralized convergence to equilibrium for concepts such as Coarse Correlated Equilibrium (CCE) or Correlated Equilibrium (CE). In this work, we improve the convergence rate to CCE in general-sum Markov games, reducing it from the previously best-known rate of $\mathcal{O}(\log^5 T / T)$ to a sharper $\mathcal{O}(\log T / T)$. This matches the best known convergence rate for CE in terms of $T$, number of iterations, while also improving the dependence on the action set size from polynomial to polylogarithmic-yielding exponential gains in high-dimensional settings. Our approach builds on recent advances in adaptive step-size techniques for no-regret algorithms in normal-form games, and extends them to the Markovian setting via a stage-wise scheme that adjusts learning rates based on real-time feedback. We frame policy updates as an instance of Optimistic Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (OFTRL), customized for value-iteration-based learning. The resulting self-play algorithm achieves, to our knowledge, the fastest known convergence rate to CCE in Markov games.

Asrin Efe Yorulmaz, Raj Kiriti Velicheti, Melih Bastopcu et al.

In this work, we investigate a steering problem in a mediator-augmented two-player normal-form game, where the mediator aims to guide players toward a specific action profile through information and incentive design. We first characterize the games for which successful steering is possible. Moreover, we establish that steering players to any desired action profile is not always achievable with information design alone, nor when accompanied with sublinear payment schemes. Consequently, we derive a lower bound on the constant payments required per round to achieve this goal. To address these limitations incurred with information design, we introduce an augmented approach that involves a one-shot information design phase before the start of the repeated game, transforming the prior interaction into a Stackelberg game. Finally, we theoretically demonstrate that this approach improves the convergence rate of players' action profiles to the target point by a constant factor with high probability, and support it with empirical results.