David Eckhoff

Corvin Deboeser, Jordan Ivanchev, Thomas Braud et al.

This paper introduces the SEAD framework that simplifies the process of designing and describing autonomous vehicle platooning manoeuvres. Although a large body of research has been formulating platooning manoeuvres, it is still challenging to design, describe, read, and understand them. This difficulty largely arises from missing formalisation. To fill this gap, we analysed existing ways of describing manoeuvres, derived the causes of difficulty, and designed a framework that simplifies the manoeuvre design process. Alongside, a Manoeuvre Design Language was developed to structurally describe manoeuvres in a machine-readable format. Unlike state-of-the-art manoeuvre descriptions that require one state machine for every participating vehicle, the SEAD framework allows describing any manoeuvre from the single perspective of the platoon leader. %As a proof of concept, the proposed framework was implemented in the mixed traffic simulation environment BEHAVE for an autonomous highway scenario. Using this framework, we implemented several manoeuvres as they were described in literature. To demonstrate the applicability of the framework, an experiment was performed to evaluate the execution time performance of multiple alternatives of the Join-Middle manoeuvre. This proof-of-concept experiment revealed that the manoeuvre execution time can be reduced by 28 \% through parallelising various steps without considerable secondary effects. We hope that the SEAD framework will pave the way for further research in the area of new manoeuvre design and optimisation by largely simplifying and unifying platooning manoeuvre representation.

Isabel Wagner, David Eckhoff

The goal of privacy metrics is to measure the degree of privacy enjoyed by users in a system and the amount of protection offered by privacy-enhancing technologies. In this way, privacy metrics contribute to improving user privacy in the digital world. The diversity and complexity of privacy metrics in the literature makes an informed choice of metrics challenging. As a result, instead of using existing metrics, new metrics are proposed frequently, and privacy studies are often incomparable. In this survey we alleviate these problems by structuring the landscape of privacy metrics. To this end, we explain and discuss a selection of over eighty privacy metrics and introduce categorizations based on the aspect of privacy they measure, their required inputs, and the type of data that needs protection. In addition, we present a method on how to choose privacy metrics based on nine questions that help identify the right privacy metrics for a given scenario, and highlight topics where additional work on privacy metrics is needed. Our survey spans multiple privacy domains and can be understood as a general framework for privacy measurement.