Stephanie Tsuei

Stephanie Tsuei, Wenjie Mo, Stefano Soatto

In state estimation algorithms that use feature tracks as input, it is customary to assume that the errors in feature track positions are zero-mean Gaussian. Using a combination of calibrated camera intrinsics, ground-truth camera pose, and depth images, it is possible to compute ground-truth positions for feature tracks extracted using an image processing algorithm. We find that feature track errors are not zero-mean Gaussian and that the distribution of errors is conditional on the type of motion, the speed of motion, and the image processing algorithm used to extract the tracks.

Alex Wong, Xiaohan Fei, Stephanie Tsuei et al.

We describe a method to infer dense depth from camera motion and sparse depth as estimated using a visual-inertial odometry system. Unlike other scenarios using point clouds from lidar or structured light sensors, we have few hundreds to few thousand points, insufficient to inform the topology of the scene. Our method first constructs a piecewise planar scaffolding of the scene, and then uses it to infer dense depth using the image along with the sparse points. We use a predictive cross-modal criterion, akin to `self-supervision,' measuring photometric consistency across time, forward-backward pose consistency, and geometric compatibility with the sparse point cloud. We also launch the first visual-inertial + depth dataset, which we hope will foster additional exploration into combining the complementary strengths of visual and inertial sensors. To compare our method to prior work, we adopt the unsupervised KITTI depth completion benchmark, and show state-of-the-art performance on it. Code available at: https://github.com/alexklwong/unsupervised-depth-completion-visual-inertial-odometry.

Stephanie Tsuei, Stefano Soatto, Paulo Tabuada et al.

The widely-used Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) provides a straightforward recipe to estimate the mean and covariance of the state given all past measurements in a causal and recursive fashion. For a wide variety of applications, the EKF is known to produce accurate estimates of the mean and typically inaccurate estimates of the covariance. For applications in visual inertial localization, we show that inaccuracies in the covariance estimates are \emph{systematic}, i.e. it is possible to learn a nonlinear map from the empirical ground truth to the estimated one. This is demonstrated on both a standard EKF in simulation and a Visual Inertial Odometry system on real-world data.

Stephanie Tsuei, Aditya Golatkar, Stefano Soatto

We propose a method to estimate the uncertainty of the outcome of an image classifier on a given input datum. Deep neural networks commonly used for image classification are deterministic maps from an input image to an output class. As such, their outcome on a given datum involves no uncertainty, so we must specify what variability we are referring to when defining, measuring and interpreting uncertainty, and attributing "confidence" to the outcome. To this end, we introduce the Wellington Posterior, which is the distribution of outcomes that would have been obtained in response to data that could have been generated by the same scene that produced the given image. Since there are infinitely many scenes that could have generated any given image, the Wellington Posterior involves inductive transfer from scenes other than the one portrayed. We explore the use of data augmentation, dropout, ensembling, single-view reconstruction, and model linearization to compute a Wellington Posterior. Additional methods include the use of conditional generative models such as generative adversarial networks, neural radiance fields, and conditional prior networks. We test these methods against the empirical posterior obtained by performing inference on multiple images of the same underlying scene. These developments are only a small step towards assessing the reliability of deep network classifiers in a manner that is compatible with safety-critical applications and human interpretation.