Tengyue Wang

Zhuoran Zhang, Tengyue Wang, Xilin Gong et al.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) must resolve conflicts when different modalities provide contradictory information, a process we term modality following. Prior work measured this behavior only with coarse dataset-level statistics, overlooking the influence of model's confidence in unimodal reasoning. In this paper, we introduce a new framework that decomposes modality following into two fundamental factors: relative reasoning uncertainty (the case-specific confidence gap between unimodal predictions) and inherent modality preference( a model's stable bias when uncertainties are balanced). To validate this framework, we construct a controllable dataset that systematically varies the reasoning difficulty of visual and textual inputs. Using entropy as a fine-grained uncertainty metric, we uncover a universal law: the probability of following a modality decreases monotonically as its relative uncertainty increases. At the relative difficulty level where the model tends to follow both modalities with comparable probability what we call the balance point, a practical indicator of the model's inherent preference. Unlike traditional macro-level ratios, this measure offers a more principled and less confounded way to characterize modality bias, disentangling it from unimodal capabilities and dataset artifacts. Further, by probing layer-wise predictions, we reveal the internal mechanism of oscillation: in ambiguous regions near the balance point, models vacillate between modalities across layers, explaining externally observed indecision. Together, these findings establish relative uncertainty and inherent preference as the two governing principles of modality following, offering both a quantitative framework and mechanistic insight into how MLLMs resolve conflicting information.

Keyuan Cheng, Xudong Shen, Yihao Yang et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various software engineering tasks; however, their effectiveness in code migration, adapting code to run in different environments, remains insufficiently studied. In this work, we introduce CODEMENV: Code Migration Across Environment, a new benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' abilities in code migration scenarios. CODEMENV consists of 922 examples spanning 19 Python and Java packages, and covers three core tasks: (1) identifying functions incompatible with specific versions, (2) detecting changes in function definitions, and (3) adapting code to target environments. Experimental evaluation with seven LLMs on CODEMENV yields an average pass@1 rate of 26.50%, with GPT-4O achieving the highest score at 43.84%. Key findings include: (i) LLMs tend to be more proficient with newer function versions, which aids in migrating legacy code, and (ii) LLMs sometimes exhibit logical inconsistencies by identifying function changes irrelevant to the intended migration environment. The datasets are available at https://github.com/xdshen-ai/Benchmark-of-Code-Migration.

Samson Sun, Tianyi Yang, Tengyue Wang et al.

The pursuit of general-purpose embodied agents is hindered by fragmented evaluation protocols that isolate navigation skills and fixate on specific robot morphologies, failing to reflect real-world scenarios where agents must orchestrate diverse behaviors across varying embodiments. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniNavBench, a benchmark for cross-skill coordination and cross-embodiment generalization. OmniNavBench introduces three paradigm shifts: (1) Compositional Complexity. We propose composite instructions that interleave sub-tasks from 6 categories (PointNav, VLN, ObjectNav, SocialNav, Human Following and EQA), compelling agents to transition between exploration, interaction, and social compliance within a single episode. (2) Morphological Universality and Sensor Flexibility. We present a simulation platform that breaks the reliance on single-morphology evaluation, enabling generalization tests across humanoid, quadrupedal, and wheeled robots, with a modular sensor interface and 170 environments blending synthetic assets with real-world scans. (3) Demonstrations Quality. Moving beyond shortest-path algorithms, we curate 1779 expert trajectories via human teleoperation, capturing behavioral nuances such as exploratory glance and anticipatory avoidance. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that current methods, despite their claimed unified design, struggle with the complex, interleaved nature of general-purpose navigation. This exposes a critical disparity between existing capabilities and real-world deployment demands, underscoring OmniNavBench as a testbed for the next generation of generalist navigators. Dataset, code, and leaderboard are available at http://omninavbench.cloud-ip.cc.