Dong-Hui Xu

h-index29
2papers
2,465citations

2 Papers

9.2LGNov 26, 2024
An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like Models

Yunzhe Hu, Difan Zou, Dong Xu

Deep neural networks have long been criticized for being black-box. To unveil the inner workings of modern neural architectures, a recent work \cite{yu2024white} proposed an information-theoretic objective function called Sparse Rate Reduction (SRR) and interpreted its unrolled optimization as a Transformer-like model called Coding Rate Reduction Transformer (CRATE). However, the focus of the study was primarily on the basic implementation, and whether this objective is optimized in practice and its causal relationship to generalization remain elusive. Going beyond this study, we derive different implementations by analyzing layer-wise behaviors of CRATE, both theoretically and empirically. To reveal the predictive power of SRR on generalization, we collect a set of model variants induced by varied implementations and hyperparameters and evaluate SRR as a complexity measure based on its correlation with generalization. Surprisingly, we find out that SRR has a positive correlation coefficient and outperforms other baseline measures, such as path-norm and sharpness-based ones. Furthermore, we show that generalization can be improved using SRR as regularization on benchmark image classification datasets. We hope this paper can shed light on leveraging SRR to design principled models and study their generalization ability.

6.2CVJan 7, 2025
Exploring Iterative Manifold Constraint for Zero-shot Image Editing

Maomao Li, Yu Li, Yunfei Liu et al.

Editability and fidelity are two essential demands for text-driven image editing, which expects that the editing area should align with the target prompt and the rest remain unchanged separately. The current cutting-edge editing methods usually obey an "inversion-then-editing" pipeline, where the input image is inverted to an approximate Gaussian noise ${z}_T$, based on which a sampling process is conducted using the target prompt. Nevertheless, we argue that it is not a good choice to use a near-Gaussian noise as a pivot for further editing since it would bring plentiful fidelity errors. We verify this by a pilot analysis, discovering that intermediate-inverted latents can achieve a better trade-off between editability and fidelity than the fully-inverted ${z}_T$. Based on this, we propose a novel zero-shot editing paradigm dubbed ZZEdit, which first locates a qualified intermediate-inverted latent marked as ${z}_p$ as a better editing pivot, which is sufficient-for-editing while structure-preserving. Then, a ZigZag process is designed to execute denoising and inversion alternately, which progressively inject target guidance to ${z}_p$ while preserving the structure information of $p$ step. Afterwards, to achieve the same step number of inversion and denoising, we execute a pure sampling process under the target prompt. Essentially, our ZZEdit performs iterative manifold constraint between the manifold of $M_{p}$ and $M_{p-1}$, leading to fewer fidelity errors. Extensive experiments highlight the effectiveness of ZZEdit in diverse image editing scenarios compared with the "inversion-then-editing" pipeline.