Omar I. Al-Bataineh

Omar I. Al-Bataineh, Anastasiia Grishina, Leon Moonen

A long-standing open challenge for automated program repair is the overfitting problem, which is caused by having insufficient or incomplete specifications to validate whether a generated patch is correct or not. Most available repair systems rely on weak specifications (i.e., specifications that are synthesized from test cases) which limits the quality of generated repairs. To strengthen specifications and improve the quality of repairs, we propose to closer integrate static bug detection techniques with automated program repair. The integration combines automated program repair with static analysis techniques in such a way that bug detection patterns can be synthesized into specifications that the repair system can use. We explore the feasibility of such integration using two types of bugs: arithmetic bugs, such as integer overflow, and logical bugs, such as termination bugs. As part of our analysis, we make several observations that help to improve patch generation for these classes of bugs. Moreover, these observations assist with narrowing down the candidate patch search space, and inferring an effective search order.

Umair Z. Ahmed, Zhiyu Fan, Jooyong Yi et al.

Automated feedback generation for introductory programming assignments is useful for programming education. Most works try to generate feedback to correct a student program by comparing its behavior with an instructor's reference program on selected tests. In this work, our aim is to generate verifiably correct program repairs as student feedback. The student assignment is aligned and composed with a reference solution in terms of control flow, and differences in data variables are automatically summarized via predicates to relate the variable names. Failed verification attempts for the equivalence of the two programs are exploited to obtain a collection of maxSMT queries, whose solutions point to repairs of the student assignment. We have conducted experiments on student assignments curated from a widely deployed intelligent tutoring system. Our results indicate that we can generate verified feedback in up to 58% of the assignments. More importantly, our system indicates when it is able to generate a verified feedback, which is then usable by novice students with high confidence.

Omar I. Al-Bataineh, Mark Reynolds

The timed-based automata model, introduced by Alur and Dill, provides a useful formalism for describing real-time systems. Over the last two decades, several dense-time model checking tools have been developed based on that model. The paper considers the verification of real-time distributed commit protocols using dense-time model checking technology. More precisely, we model and verify the well-known timed two phase commit protocol in three different state-of-the-art real-time model checkers: UPPAAL, Rabbit, and RED, and compare the results.