Bingyang Wang

CV
h-index23
5papers
9citations
Novelty39%
AI Score41

5 Papers

AIMay 22
SPACENUM: Revisiting Spatial Numerical Understanding in VLMs

Jianshu Zhang, Yijiang Li, Huifeixin Chen et al.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in embodied environments, where they need produce numerical outputs such as action magnitudes and spatial coordinates. Although these numbers appear meaningful, it remains unclear whether these numerical outputs are genuinely grounded in spatial perception. Therefore, in this work, we revisit spatial numerical understanding through SpaceNum, a unified framework that captures two complementary settings: numbers as dynamic transitions during spatial exploration, and numbers as static layouts in spatial reasoning. We formulate two bidirectional tasks, Num2Space and Space2Num, to evaluate how well VLMs map between vision-side spatial structure and language-side numerical representations. We systematically study whether current VLMs truly understand numerical values in spatial settings. Across dynamic transitions and static layouts, we find that models largely fail to ground numbers in spatial meaning and often perform close to random guess. Through error analysis, reasoning trace analysis, and controlled interventions, we show that current VLMs rely heavily on shallow spatial cues, struggle to build stable coordinate-aware representations, and fail to abstract structured spatial layouts from visual observations. We further show that explicit reasoning provides only marginal gains, while tuning can partially improve spatial numerical understanding and transfer to external spatial reasoning benchmarks.

CVFeb 14, 2025
Probing Perceptual Constancy in Large Vision-Language Models

Haoran Sun, Bingyang Wang, Suyang Yu et al.

Perceptual constancy is the ability to maintain stable perceptions of objects despite changes in sensory input, such as variations in distance, angle, or lighting. This ability is crucial for visual understanding in a dynamic world. Here, we explored such ability in current Vision Language Models (VLMs). In this study, we evaluated 155 VLMs using 236 experiments across three domains: color, size, and shape constancy. The experiments included single-image and video adaptations of classic cognitive tasks, along with novel tasks in in-the-wild conditions. We found significant variability in VLM performance across these domains, with model performance in shape constancy clearly dissociated from that of color and size constancy.

CVJun 4, 2025
Can Vision Language Models Infer Human Gaze Direction? A Controlled Study

Zory Zhang, Pinyuan Feng, Bingyang Wang et al.

The ability to infer what others are looking at is a critical component of a theory of mind that underpins natural human-AI interaction. We characterized this skill in 111 Vision Language Models (VLMs) and human participants (N = 65) using photos taken with manipulated difficulty and variability. We found that 94 of the 111 VLMs were not better than random guessing, while humans achieved near-ceiling accuracy. VLMs respond with each choice almost equally frequently. Are they randomly guessing? At least for five top-tier VLMs, their performance was above chance, declined with increasing task difficulty, but barely varied across different prompts and scene objects. These behavioral patterns cannot be explained by considering VLMs as random guessers. Instead, they likely utilize head orientation but not eye appearance to infer gaze direction, such that their performance is imperfect, subject to the task difficulty, but robust to superficial perceptual variations. This suggests that VLMs, lacking effective gaze inference skills, have yet to become technologies that can naturally interact with humans, but the potential remains.

AIMar 7
Vision Language Models Cannot Reason About Physical Transformation

Dezhi Luo, Yijiang Li, Maijunxian Wang et al.

Understanding physical transformations is fundamental for reasoning in dynamic environments. While Vision Language Models (VLMs) show promise in embodied applications, whether they genuinely understand physical transformations remains unclear. We introduce ConservationBench evaluating conservation -- whether physical quantities remain invariant under transformations. Spanning four properties with paired conserving/non-conserving scenarios, we generate 23,040 questions across 112 VLMs. Results reveal systematic failure: performance remains near chance with improvements on conservation tasks accompanied by drops on controls. Control experiments show strong textual priors favoring invariance, yet models perform worse with visual content. Neither temporal resolution, prompting, nor curated sampling helps. These findings show that current VLMs fail to maintain transformation-invariant representations of physical properties across dynamic scenes.

CVApr 7, 2025
EffOWT: Transfer Visual Language Models to Open-World Tracking Efficiently and Effectively

Bingyang Wang, Kaer Huang, Bin Li et al.

Open-World Tracking (OWT) aims to track every object of any category, which requires the model to have strong generalization capabilities. Trackers can improve their generalization ability by leveraging Visual Language Models (VLMs). However, challenges arise with the fine-tuning strategies when VLMs are transferred to OWT: full fine-tuning results in excessive parameter and memory costs, while the zero-shot strategy leads to sub-optimal performance. To solve the problem, EffOWT is proposed for efficiently transferring VLMs to OWT. Specifically, we build a small and independent learnable side network outside the VLM backbone. By freezing the backbone and only executing backpropagation on the side network, the model's efficiency requirements can be met. In addition, EffOWT enhances the side network by proposing a hybrid structure of Transformer and CNN to improve the model's performance in the OWT field. Finally, we implement sparse interactions on the MLP, thus reducing parameter updates and memory costs significantly. Thanks to the proposed methods, EffOWT achieves an absolute gain of 5.5% on the tracking metric OWTA for unknown categories, while only updating 1.3% of the parameters compared to full fine-tuning, with a 36.4% memory saving. Other metrics also demonstrate obvious improvement.