Parth Mehta

Shrey Satapara, Parth Mehta, Debasis Ganguly et al.

The recent success in language generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs), such as GPT, Bard, Llama etc., can potentially lead to concerns about their possible misuse in inducing mass agitation and communal hatred via generating fake news and spreading misinformation. Traditional means of developing a misinformation ground-truth dataset does not scale well because of the extensive manual effort required to annotate the data. In this paper, we propose an LLM-based approach of creating silver-standard ground-truth datasets for identifying misinformation. Specifically speaking, given a trusted news article, our proposed approach involves prompting LLMs to automatically generate a summarised version of the original article. The prompts in our proposed approach act as a controlling mechanism to generate specific types of factual incorrectness in the generated summaries, e.g., incorrect quantities, false attributions etc. To investigate the usefulness of this dataset, we conduct a set of experiments where we train a range of supervised models for the task of misinformation detection.

Parth Mehta, Prasenjit Majumder

With an ever growing number of extractive summarization techniques being proposed, there is less clarity then ever about how good each system is compared to the rest. Several studies highlight the variance in performance of these systems with change in datasets or even across documents within the same corpus. An effective way to counter this variance and to make the systems more robust could be to use inputs from multiple systems when generating a summary. In the present work, we define a novel way of creating such ensemble by exploiting similarity between the content of candidate summaries to estimate their reliability. We define GlobalRank which captures the performance of a candidate system on an overall corpus and LocalRank which estimates its performance on a given document cluster. We then use these two scores to assign a weight to each individual systems, which is then used to generate the new aggregate ranking. Experiments on DUC2003 and DUC 2004 datasets show a significant improvement in terms of ROUGE score, over existing sate-of-art techniques.

Parth Mehta, Gaurav Arora, Prasenjit Majumder

In this work, we present a weakly supervised sentence extraction technique for identifying important sentences in scientific papers that are worthy of inclusion in the abstract. We propose a new attention based deep learning architecture that jointly learns to identify important content, as well as the cue phrases that are indicative of summary worthy sentences. We propose a new context embedding technique for determining the focus of a given paper using topic models and use it jointly with an LSTM based sequence encoder to learn attention weights across the sentence words. We use a collection of articles publicly available through ACL anthology for our experiments. Our system achieves a performance that is better, in terms of several ROUGE metrics, as compared to several state of art extractive techniques. It also generates more coherent summaries and preserves the overall structure of the document.

Parth Mehta, Prasenjit Majumder

Multi-document summarization has received a great deal of attention in the past couple of decades. Several approaches have been proposed, many of which perform equally well and it is becoming in- creasingly difficult to choose one particular system over another. An ensemble of such systems that is able to leverage the strengths of each individual systems can build a better and more robust summary. Despite this, few attempts have been made in this direction. In this paper, we describe a category of ensemble systems which use consensus between the candidate systems to build a better meta-summary. We highlight two major shortcomings of such systems: the inability to take into account relative performance of individual systems and overlooking content of candidate summaries in favour of the sentence rankings. We propose an alternate method, content-based weighted consensus summarization, which address these concerns. We use pseudo-relevant summaries to estimate the performance of individual candidate systems, and then use this information to generate a better aggregate ranking. Experiments on DUC 2003 and DUC 2004 datasets show that the proposed system outperforms existing consensus-based techniques by a large margin.