Seunggeun Lee

Ralf Beuthan, Megan Coffee, Heejin Kim et al.

The polygenic risk scores (PRS) have emerged as an important methodology for quantifying genetic predisposition to complex traits and clinical disease. Significant progress has been made in applying PRS to conditions such as obesity, cancer, and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Studies have demonstrated that PRS can effectively identify individuals at high risk, thereby enabling early screening, personalized treatment, and targeted interventions for diseases with a genetic predisposition. One current limitation of PRS, however, is the lack of interpretability tools. To address this problem for T2DM, researchers at the Graduate School of Data Science at the Seoul National University introduced eXplainable PRS (XPRS). This visualization tool decomposes PRSs into gene-level and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) contribution scores via Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), providing granular insights into the specific genetic factors driving an individual's risk profile. We used a co-design approach to assess XPRS trustworthiness by considering legal, medical, ethical, and technical robustness during early design and potential clinical use. For that, we used Z-inspection, an ethically aligned Trustworthy AI co-design methodology, and piloted the Council of Europe's Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law Impact Assessment for AI Systems (HUDERIA) (Council of Europe (CAI) 2025). The findings of this use-case comprise a comprehensive set of ethical, legal, and technical lessons learned. These insights, identified by a multidisciplinary team of experts (ethics, legal, human rights, computer science, and medical), serve as a framework for designers to navigate future challenges with this and other AI systems. The findings also provide a useful reference for researchers developing explainability frameworks for PRS in diverse clinical contexts.

Hohyun Kim, Seunggeun Lee, Min-hwan Oh

Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) offer a powerful framework for sampling graphs in proportion to their rewards. However, existing approaches suffer from systematic biases due to inaccuracies in state transition probability computations. These biases, rooted in the inherent symmetries of graphs, impact both atom-based and fragment-based generation schemes. To address this challenge, we introduce Symmetry-Aware GFlowNets (SA-GFN), a method that incorporates symmetry corrections into the learning process through reward scaling. By integrating bias correction directly into the reward structure, SA-GFN eliminates the need for explicit state transition computations. Empirical results show that SA-GFN enables unbiased sampling while enhancing diversity and consistently generating high-reward graphs that closely match the target distribution.

Rounak Dey, Seunggeun Lee

With the development of high-throughput technologies, principal component analysis (PCA) in the high-dimensional regime is of great interest. Most of the existing theoretical and methodological results for high-dimensional PCA are based on the spiked population model in which all the population eigenvalues are equal except for a few large ones. Due to the presence of local correlation among features, however, this assumption may not be satisfied in many real-world datasets. To address this issue, we investigated the asymptotic behaviors of PCA under the generalized spiked population model. Based on the theoretical results, we proposed a series of methods for the consistent estimation of population eigenvalues, angles between the sample and population eigenvectors, correlation coefficients between the sample and population principal component (PC) scores, and the shrinkage bias adjustment for the predicted PC scores. Using numerical experiments and real data examples from the genetics literature, we showed that our methods can greatly reduce bias and improve prediction accuracy.