Xiaojing Lu

Liang Xu, Jiacheng Liu, Xiang Pan et al.

Data-centric AI has recently proven to be more effective and high-performance, while traditional model-centric AI delivers fewer and fewer benefits. It emphasizes improving the quality of datasets to achieve better model performance. This field has significant potential because of its great practicability and getting more and more attention. However, we have not seen significant research progress in this field, especially in NLP. We propose DataCLUE, which is the first Data-Centric benchmark applied in NLP field. We also provide three simple but effective baselines to foster research in this field (improve Macro-F1 up to 5.7% point). In addition, we conduct comprehensive experiments with human annotators and show the hardness of DataCLUE. We also try an advanced method: the forgetting informed bootstrapping label correction method. All the resources related to DataCLUE, including datasets, toolkit, leaderboard, and baselines, is available online at https://github.com/CLUEbenchmark/DataCLUE

Liang Xu, Xiaojing Lu, Chenyang Yuan et al.

Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have achieved tremendous success in natural language understanding tasks. While different learning schemes -- fine-tuning, zero-shot, and few-shot learning -- have been widely explored and compared for languages such as English, there is comparatively little work in Chinese to fairly and comprehensively evaluate and compare these methods and thus hinders cumulative progress. In this paper, we introduce the Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmark (FewCLUE), the first comprehensive few-shot evaluation benchmark in Chinese. It includes nine tasks, ranging from single-sentence and sentence-pair classification tasks to machine reading comprehension tasks. We systematically evaluate five state-of-the-art (SOTA) few-shot learning methods (including PET, ADAPET, LM-BFF, P-tuning and EFL), and compare their performance with fine-tuning and zero-shot learning schemes on the newly constructed FewCLUE benchmark. Experimental results reveal that: 1) The effect of different few-shot learning methods is sensitive to the pre-trained model to which the methods are applied; 2) PET and P-tuning achieve the best overall performance with RoBERTa and ERNIE respectively. Our benchmark is used in the few-shot learning contest of NLPCC 2021. In addition, we provide a user-friendly toolkit, as well as an online leaderboard to help facilitate further progress on Chinese few-shot learning. We provide a baseline performance on different learning methods, a reference for future research.