Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi

LG
h-index82
6papers
279citations
Novelty34%
AI Score42

6 Papers

LGAug 4, 2024Code
Applications of Scientific Machine Learning for the Analysis of Functionally Graded Porous Beams

Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Mostafa Bamdad, Cosmin Anitescu et al.

This study investigates different Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) approaches for the analysis of functionally graded (FG) porous beams and compares them under a new framework. The beam material properties are assumed to vary as an arbitrary continuous function. The methods consider the output of a neural network/operator as an approximation to the displacement fields and derive the equations governing beam behavior based on the continuum formulation. The methods are implemented in the framework and formulated by three approaches: (a) the vector approach leads to a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), (b) the energy approach brings about the Deep Energy Method (DEM), and (c) the data-driven approach, which results in a class of Neural Operator methods. Finally, a neural operator has been trained to predict the response of the porous beam with functionally graded material under any porosity distribution pattern and any arbitrary traction condition. The results are validated with analytical and numerical reference solutions. The data and code accompanying this manuscript will be publicly available at https://github.com/eshaghi-ms/DeepNetBeam.

LGNov 4, 2025
NOWS: Neural Operator Warm Starts for Accelerating Iterative Solvers

Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Cosmin Anitescu, Navid Valizadeh et al.

Partial differential equations (PDEs) underpin quantitative descriptions across the physical sciences and engineering, yet high-fidelity simulation remains a major computational bottleneck for many-query, real-time, and design tasks. Data-driven surrogates can be strikingly fast but are often unreliable when applied outside their training distribution. Here we introduce Neural Operator Warm Starts (NOWS), a hybrid strategy that harnesses learned solution operators to accelerate classical iterative solvers by producing high-quality initial guesses for Krylov methods such as conjugate gradient and GMRES. NOWS leaves existing discretizations and solver infrastructures intact, integrating seamlessly with finite-difference, finite-element, isogeometric analysis, finite volume method, etc. Across our benchmarks, the learned initialization consistently reduces iteration counts and end-to-end runtime, resulting in a reduction of the computational time of up to 90 %, while preserving the stability and convergence guarantees of the underlying numerical algorithms. By combining the rapid inference of neural operators with the rigor of traditional solvers, NOWS provides a practical and trustworthy approach to accelerate high-fidelity PDE simulations.

LGMay 6
Replay-Based Continual Learning for Physics-Informed Neural Operators

Yizheng Wang, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Xiaoying Zhuang et al.

Neural operators generally demonstrate strong predictive performance on in-distribution (ID) problems. However, a critical limitation of existing methods is their significant performance degradation when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) data. To address this issue, this work introduces continual learning into physics-informed neural operators, with particular emphasis on neural operators built upon the Transolver architecture, and proposes a simple yet effective replay-based continual learning strategy. The proposed method is fully physics-informed and does not require labeled data, relying solely on input fields together with physical constraints for training. When new OOD data become available, a small number of past data are incorporated through a distillation-based constraint to preserve previously acquired knowledge and alleviate catastrophic forgetting. Meanwhile, a transfer learning LoRA is employed to enable rapid adaptation to the new data. The proposed framework is systematically validated on three representative physical problems, including the Darcy flow problem in fluid mechanics, a two-dimensional hyperelastic brain tumor problem in biomechanics, and a three-dimensional linear elastic Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces problem in solid mechanics. The results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting on previously learned data while maintaining fast adaptability to new data. Compared with conventional joint training strategies, the proposed method significantly improves training efficiency while reducing additional memory usage and computational cost.

SYOct 21, 2024
Artificial intelligence for partial differential equations in computational mechanics: A review

Yizheng Wang, Jinshuai Bai, Zhongya Lin et al.

In recent years, Artificial intelligence (AI) has become ubiquitous, empowering various fields, especially integrating artificial intelligence and traditional science (AI for Science: Artificial intelligence for science), which has attracted widespread attention. In AI for Science, using artificial intelligence algorithms to solve partial differential equations (AI for PDEs: Artificial intelligence for partial differential equations) has become a focal point in computational mechanics. The core of AI for PDEs is the fusion of data and partial differential equations (PDEs), which can solve almost any PDEs. Therefore, this article provides a comprehensive review of the research on AI for PDEs, summarizing the existing algorithms and theories. The article discusses the applications of AI for PDEs in computational mechanics, including solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, and biomechanics. The existing AI for PDEs algorithms include those based on Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), Deep Energy Methods (DEM), Operator Learning, and Physics-Informed Neural Operator (PINO). AI for PDEs represents a new method of scientific simulation that provides approximate solutions to specific problems using large amounts of data, then fine-tuning according to specific physical laws, avoiding the need to compute from scratch like traditional algorithms. Thus, AI for PDEs is the prototype for future foundation models in computational mechanics, capable of significantly accelerating traditional numerical algorithms.

LGFeb 2, 2025
Transfer Learning in Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Full Fine-Tuning, Lightweight Fine-Tuning, and Low-Rank Adaptation

Yizheng Wang, Jinshuai Bai, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi et al.

AI for PDEs has garnered significant attention, particularly Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, PINNs are typically limited to solving specific problems, and any changes in problem conditions necessitate retraining. Therefore, we explore the generalization capability of transfer learning in the strong and energy form of PINNs across different boundary conditions, materials, and geometries. The transfer learning methods we employ include full finetuning, lightweight finetuning, and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). The results demonstrate that full finetuning and LoRA can significantly improve convergence speed while providing a slight enhancement in accuracy.

LGJun 16, 2024
Kolmogorov Arnold Informed neural network: A physics-informed deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems based on Kolmogorov Arnold Networks

Yizheng Wang, Jia Sun, Jinshuai Bai et al.

AI for partial differential equations (PDEs) has garnered significant attention, particularly with the emergence of Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). The recent advent of Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) indicates that there is potential to revisit and enhance the previously MLP-based PINNs. Compared to MLPs, KANs offer interpretability and require fewer parameters. PDEs can be described in various forms, such as strong form, energy form, and inverse form. While mathematically equivalent, these forms are not computationally equivalent, making the exploration of different PDE formulations significant in computational physics. Thus, we propose different PDE forms based on KAN instead of MLP, termed Kolmogorov-Arnold-Informed Neural Network (KINN) for solving forward and inverse problems. We systematically compare MLP and KAN in various numerical examples of PDEs, including multi-scale, singularity, stress concentration, nonlinear hyperelasticity, heterogeneous, and complex geometry problems. Our results demonstrate that KINN significantly outperforms MLP regarding accuracy and convergence speed for numerous PDEs in computational solid mechanics, except for the complex geometry problem. This highlights KINN's potential for more efficient and accurate PDE solutions in AI for PDEs.