ASNov 8, 2021
A hemispheric two-channel code accounts for binaural unmasking in humansJörg Encke, Mathias Dietz
Sound in noise is better detected or understood if target and masking sources originate from different locations. Mammalian physiology suggests that the neurocomputational process that underlies this binaural unmasking is based on two hemispheric channels that encode interaural differences in their relative neuronal activity. Here, we introduce a mathematical formulation of the two-channel model - the complex-valued correlation coefficient. We show that this formulation quantifies the amount of temporal fluctuations in interaural differences, which we suggest underlie binaural unmasking. We applied this model to an extensive library of psychoacoustic experiments, accounting for 98% of the variance across eight studies. Combining physiological plausibility with its success in explaining behavioral data, the proposed mechanism is a significant step towards a unified understanding of binaural unmasking and the encoding of interaural differences in general.
ASOct 6, 2021
Lower Interaural Coherence in Off-Signal Bands Impairs Binaural DetectionBernhard Eurich, Jörg Encke, Stephan D. Ewert et al.
Differences in interaural phase configuration between a target and a masker can lead to substantial binaural unmasking. This effect is decreased for masking noises with an interaural time difference (ITD). Adding a second noise with an opposing ITD in most cases further reduces binaural unmasking. Thus far, modeling of these detection thresholds required both a mechanism for internal ITD compensation and an increased binaural bandwidth. An alternative explanation for the reduction is that unmasking is impaired by the lower interaural coherence in off-frequency regions caused by the second masker (Marquardt & McAlpine, 2009, JASA pp. EL177 - EL182). Based on this hypothesis, the current work proposes a quantitative multi-channel model using monaurally derived peripheral filter bandwidths and an across-channel incoherence interference mechanism. This mechanism differs from wider filters since it has no effect when the masker coherence is constant across frequency bands. Combined with a monaural energy discrimination pathway, the model predicts the differences between a single delayed noise and two opposingly delayed noises, as well as four other data sets. It helps resolve the inconsistency explaining some data sets requires wide filters while others require narrow filters.
ASJul 1, 2021
Prediction of tone detection thresholds in interaurally delayed noise based on interaural phase difference fluctuationsMathias Dietz, Jörg Encke, Kristin I. Bracklo et al.
Differences between the interaural phase of a noise and a target tone improve detection thresholds. The maximum masking release is obtained for detecting an antiphasic tone (S$π$) in diotic noise (N0). It has been shown in several studies that this benefit gradually declines as an interaural delay is applied to the N0S$π$ complex. This decline has been attributed to the reduced interaural coherence of the noise. Here, we report detection thresholds for a 500 Hz tone in masking noise with up to 8 ms interaural delay and bandwidths from 25 to 1000 Hz. When reducing the noise bandwidth from 100 to 50 and 25 Hz, the masking release at 8 ms delay increases, as expected for increasing temporal coherence with decreasing bandwidth. For bandwidths of 100 to 1000 Hz, no significant difference was observed and detection thresholds with these noises have a delay dependence that is fully described by the temporal coherence imposed by the typical monaurally determined auditory filter bandwidth. A minimalistic binaural model is suggested based on interaural phase difference fluctuations without the assumption of delay lines.
SDNov 11, 2015
Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tonesMartin Klein-Hennig, Mathias Dietz, Volker Hohmann
Both harmonic and binaural signal properties are relevant for auditory processing. To investigate how these cues combine in the auditory system, detection thresholds for an 800-Hz tone masked by a diotic (i.e., identical between the ears) harmonic complex tone were measured in six normal-hearing subjects. The target tone was presented either diotically or with an interaural phase difference (IPD) of 180 degree and in either harmonic or "mistuned" relationship to the diotic masker. Three different maskers were used, a resolved and an unresolved complex tone (fundamental frequency: 160 and 40 Hz) with four components below and above the target frequency and a broadband unresolved complex tone with 12 additional components. The target IPD provided release from masking in most masker conditions, whereas mistuning led to a significant release from masking only in the diotic conditions with the resolved and the narrowband unresolved maskers. A significant effect of mistuning was neither found in the diotic condition with the wideband unresolved masker nor in any of the dichotic conditions. An auditory model with a single analysis frequency band and different binaural processing schemes was employed to predict the data of the unresolved masker conditions. Sensitivity to modulation cues was achieved by including an auditory-motivated modulation filter in the processing pathway. The predictions of the diotic data were in line with the experimental results and literature data in the narrowband condition, but not in the broadband condition, suggesting that across-frequency processing is involved in processing modulation information. The experimental and model results in the dichotic conditions show that the binaural processor cannot exploit modulation information in binaurally unmasked conditions.