Li-Hsin Chang

Li-Hsin Chang, Sampo Pyysalo, Jenna Kanerva et al.

Language models based on deep neural networks have facilitated great advances in natural language processing and understanding tasks in recent years. While models covering a large number of languages have been introduced, their multilinguality has come at a cost in terms of monolingual performance, and the best-performing models at most tasks not involving cross-lingual transfer remain monolingual. In this paper, we consider the question of whether it is possible to pre-train a bilingual model for two remotely related languages without compromising performance at either language. We collect pre-training data, create a Finnish-English bilingual BERT model and evaluate its performance on datasets used to evaluate the corresponding monolingual models. Our bilingual model performs on par with Google's original English BERT on GLUE and nearly matches the performance of monolingual Finnish BERT on a range of Finnish NLP tasks, clearly outperforming multilingual BERT. We find that when the model vocabulary size is increased, the BERT-Base architecture has sufficient capacity to learn two remotely related languages to a level where it achieves comparable performance with monolingual models, demonstrating the feasibility of training fully bilingual deep language models. The model and all tools involved in its creation are freely available at https://github.com/TurkuNLP/biBERT

Jenna Kanerva, Filip Ginter, Li-Hsin Chang et al.

This document describes the annotation guidelines used to construct the Turku Paraphrase Corpus. These guidelines were developed together with the corpus annotation, revising and extending the guidelines regularly during the annotation work. Our paraphrase annotation scheme uses the base scale 1-4, where labels 1 and 2 are used for negative candidates (not paraphrases), while labels 3 and 4 are paraphrases at least in the given context if not everywhere. In addition to base labeling, the scheme is enriched with additional subcategories (flags) for categorizing different types of paraphrases inside the two positive labels, making the annotation scheme suitable for more fine-grained paraphrase categorization. The annotation scheme is used to annotate over 100,000 Finnish paraphrase pairs.

Li-Hsin Chang, Sampo Pyysalo, Jenna Kanerva et al.

In this paper, we present a quantitative evaluation of differences between alternative translations in a large recently released Finnish paraphrase corpus focusing in particular on non-trivial variation in translation. We combine a series of automatic steps detecting systematic variation with manual analysis to reveal regularities and identify categories of translation differences. We find the paraphrase corpus to contain highly non-trivial translation variants difficult to recognize through automatic approaches.

Li-Hsin Chang, Iiro Rastas, Sampo Pyysalo et al.

Essays as a form of assessment test student knowledge on a deeper level than short answer and multiple-choice questions. However, the manual evaluation of essays is time- and labor-consuming. Automatic clustering of essays, or their fragments, prior to manual evaluation presents a possible solution to reducing the effort required in the evaluation process. Such clustering presents numerous challenges due to the variability and ambiguity of natural language. In this paper, we introduce two datasets of undergraduate student essays in Finnish, manually annotated for salient arguments on the sentence level. Using these datasets, we evaluate several deep-learning embedding methods for their suitability to sentence clustering in support of essay grading. We find that the choice of the most suitable method depends on the nature of the exam question and the answers, with deep-learning methods being capable of, but not guaranteeing better performance over simpler methods based on lexical overlap.

Jenna Kanerva, Filip Ginter, Li-Hsin Chang et al.

In this paper, we introduce the first fully manually annotated paraphrase corpus for Finnish containing 53,572 paraphrase pairs harvested from alternative subtitles and news headings. Out of all paraphrase pairs in our corpus 98% are manually classified to be paraphrases at least in their given context, if not in all contexts. Additionally, we establish a manual candidate selection method and demonstrate its feasibility in high quality paraphrase selection in terms of both cost and quality.