13.5CVFeb 24, 2024
FedMM: Federated Multi-Modal Learning with Modality Heterogeneity in Computational PathologyYuanzhe Peng, Jieming Bian, Jie Xu
The fusion of complementary multimodal information is crucial in computational pathology for accurate diagnostics. However, existing multimodal learning approaches necessitate access to users' raw data, posing substantial privacy risks. While Federated Learning (FL) serves as a privacy-preserving alternative, it falls short in addressing the challenges posed by heterogeneous (yet possibly overlapped) modalities data across various hospitals. To bridge this gap, we propose a Federated Multi-Modal (FedMM) learning framework that federatedly trains multiple single-modal feature extractors to enhance subsequent classification performance instead of existing FL that aims to train a unified multimodal fusion model. Any participating hospital, even with small-scale datasets or limited devices, can leverage these federated trained extractors to perform local downstream tasks (e.g., classification) while ensuring data privacy. Through comprehensive evaluations of two publicly available datasets, we demonstrate that FedMM notably outperforms two baselines in accuracy and AUC metrics.
2.7CLNov 17, 2025
TCM-5CEval: Extended Deep Evaluation Benchmark for LLM's Comprehensive Clinical Research Competence in Traditional Chinese MedicineTianai Huang, Jiayuan Chen, Lu Lu et al.
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in general domains, yet their application in highly specialized and culturally-rich fields like Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) requires rigorous and nuanced evaluation. Building upon prior foundational work such as TCM-3CEval, which highlighted systemic knowledge gaps and the importance of cultural-contextual alignment, we introduce TCM-5CEval, a more granular and comprehensive benchmark. TCM-5CEval is designed to assess LLMs across five critical dimensions: (1) Core Knowledge (TCM-Exam), (2) Classical Literacy (TCM-LitQA), (3) Clinical Decision-making (TCM-MRCD), (4) Chinese Materia Medica (TCM-CMM), and (5) Clinical Non-pharmacological Therapy (TCM-ClinNPT). We conducted a thorough evaluation of fifteen prominent LLMs, revealing significant performance disparities and identifying top-performing models like deepseek\_r1 and gemini\_2\_5\_pro. Our findings show that while models exhibit proficiency in recalling foundational knowledge, they struggle with the interpretative complexities of classical texts. Critically, permutation-based consistency testing reveals widespread fragilities in model inference. All evaluated models, including the highest-scoring ones, displayed a substantial performance degradation when faced with varied question option ordering, indicating a pervasive sensitivity to positional bias and a lack of robust understanding. TCM-5CEval not only provides a more detailed diagnostic tool for LLM capabilities in TCM but aldso exposes fundamental weaknesses in their reasoning stability. To promote further research and standardized comparison, TCM-5CEval has been uploaded to the Medbench platform, joining its predecessor in the "In-depth Challenge for Comprehensive TCM Abilities" special track.