Yen-Ku Liu

Yen-Ku Liu, Yun-Cheng Tsai

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated AI-assisted software development, yet practical deployment remains constrained by incomplete implementations, weak modularization, and inconsistent security practices. We introduce Questions-of-Thoughts (QoT), a quality-driven inference-time scaffold that turns a user goal into (i) an ordered sequence of engineering steps and (ii) stepwise self-questioning to verify constraints and reduce omission errors, while maintaining a lightweight reasoning record that stabilizes subsequent design decisions. We evaluate QoT across three representative backend engineering domains: API Design, Data Communication, and File Systems. Each task requires multi-module decomposition and exposes standard failure modes in LLM-generated systems. To enable data-driven comparison, we score generated artifacts using an ISO/IEC-inspired quality rubric that measures Scalability, Completeness, Modularity, and Security. We report domain-wise gains as the change in total quality score, defined as the QoT score minus the NoQoT score. Results show capacity-dependent improvements: QoT yields consistent quality improvements for larger models and more complex domains, while smaller models may exhibit trade-offs under tight context and planning budgets. We release an open artifact with prompts, scoring guidelines, raw generations, and scripts that reproduce the reported tables and figures to support applied AI and data analytics research.

Yun-Cheng Tsai, Yen-Ku Liu, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen

Blockchain transaction data is inherently high dimensional, noisy, and entangled, posing substantial challenges for traditional clustering algorithms. While quantum enhanced clustering models have demonstrated promising performance gains, their interpretability remains limited, restricting their application in sensitive domains such as financial fraud detection and blockchain governance. To address this gap, we propose a two stage analysis framework that synergistically combines quantitative clustering evaluation with AI Agent assisted qualitative interpretation. In the first stage, we employ classical clustering methods and evaluation metrics including the Silhouette Score, Davies Bouldin Index, and Calinski Harabasz Index to determine the optimal cluster count and baseline partition quality. In the second stage, we integrate an AI Agent to generate human readable, semantic explanations of clustering results, identifying intra cluster characteristics and inter cluster relationships. Our experiments reveal that while fully trained Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) outperform random Quantum Features (QF) in quantitative metrics, the AI Agent further uncovers nuanced differences between these methods, notably exposing the singleton cluster phenomenon in QNN driven models. The consolidated insights from both stages consistently endorse the three cluster configuration, demonstrating the practical value of our hybrid approach. This work advances the interpretability frontier in quantum assisted blockchain analytics and lays the groundwork for future autonomous AI orchestrated clustering frameworks.