Felix Huber

Gerard Anglès Munné, Felix Huber

A fundamental problem in quantum coding theory is to determine the maximum size of quantum codes of given block length and distance. A recent work introduced bounds based on semidefinite programming, strengthening the well-known quantum linear programming bounds. However, floating-point inaccuracies prevent the extraction of rigorous non-existence proofs from the numerical methods. Here, we address this by providing rational infeasibility certificates for a range of quantum codes. Using a clustered low-rank solver with heuristic rounding to algebraic expressions, we can improve upon $18$ upper bounds on the maximum size of $n$-qubit codes with $6 \leq n \leq 19$. Our work highlights the practicality and scalability of semidefinite programming for quantum coding bounds.

Stephan Wäldchen, Felix Huber, Sebastian Pokutta

One of the goals of Explainable AI (XAI) is to determine which input components were relevant for a classifier decision. This is commonly know as saliency attribution. Characteristic functions (from cooperative game theory) are able to evaluate partial inputs and form the basis for theoretically "fair" attribution methods like Shapley values. Given only a standard classifier function, it is unclear how partial input should be realised. Instead, most XAI-methods for black-box classifiers like neural networks consider counterfactual inputs that generally lie off-manifold. This makes them hard to evaluate and easy to manipulate. We propose a setup to directly train characteristic functions in the form of neural networks to play simple two-player games. We apply this to the game of Connect Four by randomly hiding colour information from our agents during training. This has three advantages for comparing XAI-methods: It alleviates the ambiguity about how to realise partial input, makes off-manifold evaluation unnecessary and allows us to compare the methods by letting them play against each other.