Jianxi Fan

Xiaorui Li, Baolei Cheng, Jianxi Fan et al.

A network can contain numerous spanning trees. If two spanning trees $T_i,T_j$ do not share any common edges, $T_i$ and $T_j$ are said to be pairwisely edge-disjoint. For spanning trees $T_1, T_2, ..., T_m$, if every two of them are pairwisely edge-disjoint, they are called completely edge-independent spanning trees (CEISTs for short). CEISTs can facilitate many network functionalities, and constructing CEISTs as maximally allowed as possible in a given network is a worthy undertaking. In this paper, we establish the maximal number of CEISTs in the locally twisted cube network, and propose an algorithm to construct $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor$ CEISTs in $LTQ_n$, the $n$-dimensional locally twisted cube. The proposed algorithm has been actually implemented, and we present the outputs. Network broadcasting in the $LTQ_n$ was simulated using $\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor$ CEISTs, and the performance compared with broadcasting using a single tree.

Jingya Zhou, Ling Liu, Wenqi Wei et al.

Network representation learning (NRL) advances the conventional graph mining of social networks, knowledge graphs, and complex biomedical and physics information networks. Over dozens of network representation learning algorithms have been reported in the literature. Most of them focus on learning node embeddings for homogeneous networks, but they differ in the specific encoding schemes and specific types of node semantics captured and used for learning node embedding. This survey paper reviews the design principles and the different node embedding techniques for network representation learning over homogeneous networks. To facilitate the comparison of different node embedding algorithms, we introduce a unified reference framework to divide and generalize the node embedding learning process on a given network into preprocessing steps, node feature extraction steps and node embedding model training for a NRL task such as link prediction and node clustering. With this unifying reference framework, we highlight the representative methods, models, and techniques used at different stages of the node embedding model learning process. This survey not only helps researchers and practitioners to gain an in-depth understanding of different network representation learning techniques but also provides practical guidelines for designing and developing the next generation of network representation learning algorithms and systems.